ULFA’s Involvement in
Assassination Attempt on Sheikh Hasina
- Bangladesh Monitor - Paper No. 5
By Dr. Anand Kumar
United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA)
has been known for its terror activities in the northeastern
state of Assam, where it claims to be fighting for the
independence of the state. But recent disclosures have
indicated that its terror acts are not limited to India
only. It has been involved in a major terrorist activity in
the neighbouring Bangladesh. It acted as a tool in the hands
of certain political forces of Bangladesh who despise a
major political alliance in that country led by Sheikh
Hasina. Interestingly, ULFA also despises this alliance,
though it rarely says so openly. In these circumstances, it
is hardly surprising that the outfit made a common cause
with the opponents of Hasina led alliance and tried to
eliminate her in a public rally.
On August 21, 2004, a murderous attack
took place on Sheikh Hasina while she was addressing a
public rally in Dhaka. In this incident 23 people were
killed. One of the victims was Ivy Rahman, a close associate
of Sheikh Hasina. Sheikh Hasina herself narrowly escaped
with some injuries.
It is widely believed that this attack
had the sanction of former four party alliance. Without
their support, it was almost impossible for the attackers to
escape from such a huge gathering.
Though formally the four party alliance
condemned the attack, it never made any serious attempt to
investigate the case. The law enforcement agencies also
played a dubious role. It has been alleged that the
investigators have deliberately tried to destroy the
evidence. They did not collect the pieces of evidence,
including the unexploded grenades, which were vital for the
investigation. Army explosives experts detonated two
unexploded grenades--one found near the spot and another at
the adjacent Gulistan Hawkers' Market--in the dead of night
without taking fingerprints on them. They carried out a
similar detonation of another grenade recovered from the
Dhaka Central Jail a day after the attack. They also tried
to hurriedly bury two victims.
The investigators attempted to submit
the charge sheet of the case over a year ago basing on the
confessional statement of Joz Mia, but the government held
them back following the criticism from media which termed
Joz Mia's story very weakly-woven. Twenty people were
arrested after the attack but 17 of them were released as
the allegation against them had "no merit". The rest three
gave statements admitting their involvement in the attack. A
Harkatul Jihad (Huji) operative also claimed last year that
the Islamist militant group was behind the attack.
The one-member government judicial
inquiry commission of Justice Joynul Abedin linked a foreign
enemy with the attack but his report was not made public.
The judicial inquiry commission claimed to have identified
the perpetrators but its head declined to disclose their
identity.
To give these investigations some
semblance of authenticity the BNP led government tried to
involve the Interpol and other international investigating
agencies, but not before removing all the important clues.
Interestingly, the recent arrest of a
ULFA commander has contradicted these earlier ‘findings.’ A
report was published in the Bangladesh media on January 21
which stated that ULFA cadres operating from the country
carried out the attack, with the help of intelligence
officials of the then Zia government. A private news agency
of Bangladesh BDNews24.com quoted Assam police intelligence
chief Khagen Sharma as saying that a ULFA commander, Pallav
Saikia, has confessed about the involvement of his group in
attacking the Awami League rally. Saikia, arrested in
Shillong on December 14, 2006, said that he led 11 men from
his group. He reportedly said, "Some Bangladesh intelligence
officials helped us plan the assault and even gave us the
vehicles for the assault but I don't know these
Bangladeshis."
Saikia further confessed that his group
attacked the rally at the "explicit instruction" of ULFA
military wing chief Paresh Barua. He revealed that the
intelligence officials started interacting with him after
Paresh Barua briefed Saikia on the mission on July 26 in a
safe house in Gulshan in Dhaka. Saikia has also named
everyone in the group, including the second-in-command,
Rubul Ali, who accompanied him on the assault. Of the 11,
six are still alive and operating for the ULFA but Rubul is
dead, killed in an encounter with the Indian army in May
2006. Pallav Saikia is believed to be close to ULFA military
wing chief Paresh Barua. He led a special unit of the group
involved in high profile assassinations and acts of
sabotage.
Confession of Saikia received further
substance when a Bangla national daily also reported that
former National Security Intelligence (NSI) chief Maj Gen
Rezakul Haider Chowdhury assisted the ULFA in carrying out
the attack on August 21 and Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh
(JMB) later in raising bomb attacks. The official was
transferred and then dismissed from service earlier this
month.
These disclosures have prompted the
Awami League to ask the caretaker government of Bangladesh
to take a fresh look in this investigation. Hasina's aide
Obaidul Quader Choudhury said, "If former Prime Minister
Khaleda Zia, her son Tareq Rahman and former ministers
Lutfuzzaman Babar, Moudud Ahmed and Nazmul Huda are
interrogated, everything will come to light."
ULFA, however, has denied the
allegation. ULFA spokesperson Ruby Bhuyan reportedly said, "Pallav
Saika is either saying all this nonsense under pressure or
he has been bought over and forced to say all this…we don't
meddle in the politics of any other country, we are just
fighting to liberate Assam from Indian control." ULFA
chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa said, "We are not at all involved
in any such attacks in Bangladesh."
The Bangladesh government has also said
that it was not aware of the suspected role of ULFA in the
grenade attack on Awami League chief Sheikh Hasina’s rally
in August 2004. Acting Foreign Secretary Touhid Hossain
said, “I am not aware of it... If India conveys the matter
officially, Bangladesh will look into it.” Hossain repeated
Dhaka's known stand that there are no Indian insurgents
living or operating on Bangladesh soil.
This denial of ULFA is with the
objective of safeguarding its camps in Bangladesh. ULFA has
been operating from its bases in Bangladesh for nearly last
15 years, irrespective of which party ruled the country.
Hardly any action has been taken against the outfit.
Reports have indicated that ULFA is
funding select candidates in the now deferred general
elections in Bangladesh. It is providing money to certain
candidates from a cross section of parties in the election
expected to produce a stiff contest between the two main
alliances led by the Bangladesh National Party (BNP) and the
Awami League. Intelligence sources say that it is partially
funding at least 15 candidates, besides indirectly donating
to party funds of a few major parties. Most of these
candidates are also believed to be very close to the ISI.
It has been estimated that ULFA is
pumping over Rs 300 million (nearly $6 million) in the
polls. The self-styled commander-in-chief of ULFA, Paresh
Barua, is one of the wealthiest leaders in the outfit. His
personal earnings a year from business ventures in
Bangladesh are staggering. The total assets of ULFA are
valued at over Rs 5 billion. This includes several benami
(illegally operating) companies. Barua, against whom
Interpol alerts have been issued, also goes by the names of
Kamruj Zaman Khan, Nur-uz-Zaman and Zaman Bhai in Dhaka.
Stakes for ULFA in the coming
Bangladesh election is very high. The new government will
have the authority to decide either to give shelter to ULFA
leaders and cadres or to hand them over to India. ULFA fears
that with Indian influence growing in Southeast Asia and
with the US cooperating with India on many issues including
terrorism, the possibility of the rebels being deported to
India seems very real. ULFA expects trouble after the
elections. Hence it is supporting a large number of
candidates who can be helpful for the outfit once the
election process is over.
This is not the only time ULFA has been
involved in terror acts with the help of DGFI, the external
intelligence agency of Bangladesh. Some analysts believe
that the recent terror run of ULFA in Assam was a joint
operation with DGFI. They claim that around December 28,
2006 top ULFA leaders and DGFI officials met at a safe house
in Dhaka, and an operational task was charted out to create
serious disruptions in Assam and in Siliguri to divert
Indian attention from the election impasse in Bangladesh.
About 10 trained DGFI special task force members infiltrated
into Assam and teamed up with ULFA cadres to carry out the
mass killings.
The infiltration of DGFI personnel into
Assam is not a new development. To bolster sagging morale of
local ULFA cadres and to deceive the Assam people, such
special DGFI operators help ULFA cadres carry out
spectacular actions. Some DGFI commandos are housed by
Assam-based Muslim jihadi groups.
The role of ISI has also been
significant in recent ULFA operations in Assam. Top ULFA
leaders Paresh Barua and Arabinda Rajkhowa reportedly
returned to Dhaka from a trip to Pakistan around December
20, 2006. Rajkhowa, who is trying to acquire an apartment in
London with assistance of Dhaka-based ISI operatives, was
pressurised to carry out the recent Assam task. Barua has
reportedly bought apartments in Bangkok and London.
In the past, India has accused
Bangladesh of providing sanctuary to ULFA rebels, who have
waged a separatist campaign since 1979. Besides Paresh Barua,
the outfit's self-style chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa and
another top-rung leader Anup Chetia are believed to be based
in Bangladesh. Chetia, held and tried by a Dhaka court,
served his full jail term but has not been handed over to
India.
Conclusion
The interim Bangladesh government has
stated that it is not going to shelter Indian insurgents. On
February 4, the Bengali daily Ittefaq quoted a foreign
ministry official as saying, “The eastern frontiers with
India will be tightened further by the caretaker government
to stop the activities of (Indian) guerrillas from inside
Bangladesh. They will not be allowed to set up camps on
Bangladeshi soil." The caretaker government has also
reportedly stated that it will make sure that Anup Chetia,
secretary general of ULFA, now serving a prison term in
Bangladesh for illegally entering the country, is not
allowed to spearhead insurgency from a Bangladeshi prison. A
large number of reforms have been taken by the caretaker
government of Fakhruddin Ahmed. It has cracked down on a
number of corrupt political leaders whom nobody else dared
to touch. It has also taken a bold decision of inviting an
Indian company BHEL to build a power plant in Bangladesh.
Probably, the caretaker government which has complete
backing of the military, can also take some steps to remove
a longstanding hurdle in the path of good Indo-Bangladesh
relations by cracking down on the camps of these insurgent
outfits. This would be in the interest of both the
countries.
(The author can be reached at
anandkrai@yahoo.com)