MY
SHANGHAI DIARY--II: WHY ANGER?
By B. Raman
(Based on the writer's
visit to Shanghai from May 6 to 9, 2008, for a discussion on
the "Beijing Olympics & Security" )
1. Why anger?
2. Because of what the
Tibetans did in Lhasa on March 14, 2008, when there was
large-scale violence directed at the Han Chinese and their
property and thereafter in other Tibetan-inhabited areas
outside the Tibet autonomous region.
3. Because of what the
Chinese perceive and allege as the role played by the Dalai
Lama, the Dharamsala-based Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC) and
some members of the Tibetan diaspora in the West in
instigating this violence.
4. Because of the alleged
role played by Western---particularly American --- human
rights activists and non-governmental organisations such as
the US-based National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the
Germany-based Neumann Stiftung (Foundation) and the
France-based "Reporters Without Frontiers" in instigating,
funding and encouraging this violence.
5. Because of what the
Chinese indignantly describe as the baseless allegations
disseminated by the Dalai Lama, his advisers and the TYC
regarding large-scale deaths of Tibetans during firing by
the Chinese security forces in Lhasa and cultutal genocide
in Tibet.
6. Because of what the
Chinese describe as a mischievous, motivated and one-sided
projection of the events by most of the Western media.
7. They do not hesitate to
call the Dalai Lama, the TYC and their supporters as a pack
of dishonest liars who have learnt the techniques of
disinformation from their Western---particularly American--
supporters and funders.
8. They point out that while
nearly 20 Hans were brutally killed by Tibetan mobs on March
14, 2008---with some of them burnt alive--- there was not a
single instance of retaliatory killing of Tibetans by the
Hans. Even according to the Dalai Lama's version, the
Tibetans who were killed died in the action taken by the
security forces to quell violence by the Tibetan mobs and
not at the hands of Han civilians, who, it is said,
conducted themselves with great restraint despite the
Tibetan attacks on them.
9. All sections of the
Chinese one met were outraged that while the Western media
played up what the Chinese describe as the baseless stories
of the Dalai Lama's set-up, they blacked out the version of
the Chinese Government.
10. Surprise was expressed
over the fact that even large sections of the Indian media
and analysts mainly accepted the Western and the Dalai
Lama's versions, and ignored the Chinese Government's
version or played it down.
11. The Dalai Lama----who is
contemptuously referred to as Dalai or as the head of the
Dalai clique--- is the most distrusted and disliked figure
in China. He is seen as a double-dealer, as a man who says
one thing, but does another, who keeps changing his position
frequently depending on the prevailing circumstances.
12. According to them, the
Dalai Lama openly talks of autonomy, but secretly asks the
TYC to fight for independence, openly preaches non-violence,
but secretly asks the TYC to take to violence, openly
supports the holding of the Olympics in Beijing, but
secretly asks the TYC to co-operate with
Western---particularly American---human rights groups in
sabotaging it.
13.How can we seriously deal
with a person like him, who does not inspire confidence and
trust, they ask. They are outraged by his demand for a
Greater Tibet by merging in Tibet other Tibetan-inhabited
areas of China, which do not now form part of the Tibet
autonomous region and rule out even discussing this with
him.
14. It is apparent that
while they might be prepared to talk with the
representatives of the Dalai Lama about his own future as
the leader of the Tibetan Buddhists, they might not be
prepared to discuss with him the future of Tibet. They
dismiss firmly any suggestions for a Hong Kong or Taiwan
style status for Tibet under the one country, two systems
formula. They seem to suspect that the Dalai Lama's strategy
is to come back to Tibet under an agreement with the
Chinese, re-assume his political role and create a
Taiwan-like situation by introducing a multi-party liberal
democracy on the Indian model.
15. The TYC is widely seen
as a terrorist organisation no different from Al Qaeda or
the Islamic Movement of East Turkestan or the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). They claim to have captured
arms and ammunition from the possession of TYC supporters in
Tibet. The argument that the Dalai Lama is a good man, a
great admirer of Mahatma Gandhi, a charismatic religious
personality and has had no role in the radicalisation of the
TYC falls on deaf ears.
16. There is appreciation of
the stand taken by the Government of India that it would not
allow the Dalai Lama's set-up to indulge in anti-Chinese
activities from Indian territory and of the measures taken
by the Government to ensure a safe passage for the Olympic
Flame through New Delhi.
17. At the same time, one
could discern an air of puzzlement over what is apparently
perceived as the inaction of the Government of India against
the TYC---particularly some American nationals of Tibetan
origin, who now seem to dominate its policy-making and
activities.
18. The Olympic flame has
been successfully taken to the top of the Everest. It is
proposed to be taken across the Tibetan-inhabited areas,
including Tibet, in the third week of June. If there is a
fresh outbreak of violence during that period, one should
not be surprised if the Chinese authorities take up with the
Government of India the question of arresting and
extraditing to China those whom they might perceive as the
ring leaders of the TYC-sponsored violence. ( To be
continued.)
(The writer is
Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of
India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For
Topical Studies, Chennai. He is also associated with the
Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)