My Shanghai Diary---IV:
Suspicions and Ground Reality
by B. Raman
(Based on the writer's visit to Shanghai
from May 6 to 9, 2008, for a discussion on
the "Beijing Olympics & Security")
The suspicions of the Chinese relating to
a possible foreign hand in the recent
uprising in Tibet seem to be focussed
essentially on three non-governmental
organisations, namely, the National
Endowment For Democracy (NED) of the US, the
Neumann Stiftung (Foundation) of Germany,
and the "Reporters Without Borders " of
France and the US-funded Radio Free Asia,
which was started by the Clinton
Administration.
2. Two detailed papers on the NED
prepared by me in the past are available at
http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers2/paper115.html
and
http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers2/paper198.html.
Not much is known about the other two NGOs.
Radio Free Asia's budget was increased by
the concerned authorities in Washington DC
after the outbreak of the Tibetan uprising
in March, 2008. It is not known where from
it broadcasts --- possibly Taiwan or
Thailand. Its Tibetan language programmes
seem to be largely produced in Nepal and its
Uighur language programmes in Pakistan and
Turkey.
3. I had reported as follows in my
paper of March 19, 2008, available at
http://www.c3sindia.org/tibet/206/us-steps-up-broadcasts-telecasts-to-tibet/
: "The US authorities are reported to have
taken action to strengthen the transmitting
power of Radio Free Asia (RFA) and the Voice
of America (VOA) in order to enable their
broadcasts to overcome the jamming by the
Chinese authorities. They have also
announced an increase in their hours of
broadcasts and telecasts to the Tibetan
people with effect from March 18, 2008. Mr.
James K. Glassman, the Chairman of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which
is an independent federal agency which
supervises all U.S. government-supported,
non-military international broadcasting,
announced on March 18, 2008, as follows:
“The violent crackdown by Chinese
authorities in Tibet compels us to increase
our broadcasts. Our audience clearly
will benefit from these trustworthy sources
of news and information, which differ
sharply from Chinese government sanctioned
broadcasts.” At present, RFA broadcasts
eight hours daily to Tibet via shortwave
radio. The VOA broadcasts four hours daily,
also via shortwave. With effect from March
18, each has expanded its respective radio
programmes by two additional hours daily.
The VOA will also double its weekly
Tibetan-language television programming from
one to two hours via the AsiaSat 3
satellite. Mr. Libby Liu, President of the
RFA, said on March 18, 2008: “RFA’s Tibetan
service is working round the clock to bring
authoritative, breaking news to the Tibetan
people. These additional hours will greatly
enhance our capacity to deliver this news,
including live updates, to people on the
ground.”
4. The Chinese also seem to suspect
that some Indian NGOs may be helping the
Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC). An anonymous
E-mail circulating in China alleges than an
Indian organisation called "Defence" has
been running training classes for TYC
elements in Himachal Pradesh. It is further
alleged that Chota Rajan, the mafia leader,
is orchestrating the training of
anti-Pakistan elements from Afghanistan and
anti-China elements from Himachal Pradesh in
India. One cannot rule out the possibility
that this mischievous mail making baseless
allegations against India is being
disseminated by the mafia group of
Karachi-based Dawood Ibrahim at the instance
of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)
in order to plant suspicions about India in
the minds of the Chinese.
5. Even after all that has happened since
March 10,2008, one could notice a
reluctance on the part of the Chinese to
come to terms with three stark realities
staring them in their face. Firstly, despite
the undoubted economic progress in Tibet,
there is considerable alienation against
Beijing due to religious reasons and due to
perceptions of discrimination against the
Tibetans. Second, the unwise demonisation of
the Dalai Lama by the Chinese authorities
has not dented the reverence in which he is
held not only by the Tibetans, but also by
large sections of the Buddhists all over the
world. This demonisation of His Holiness by
the Chinese authorities has proved
counter-productive and has added to the
alienation. Unless they reverse this policy
and treat the Dalai Lama with all the
respect that is his due, they cannot reverse
the process of alienation. Third, there is
no doubt that organisations such as the NED
and the RFA have been taking advantage of
the situation created by the mishandling of
the Tibetan people by the Chinese
authorities in order to fish in troubled
waters. The Chinese have to blame themselves
for this.
6. While it is not correct that any
Indian organisation or group has been
helping the TYC, one cannot deny that large
sections of the Indian civil
society---including this writer--- have an
empathy for the Tibetans and His Holiness
and wish them success in their efforts to
highlight their grievances and have them
redressed. If they do not feel sorry for the
Chinese in their predicament, it is because
of the way the Chinese have repeatedly
stabbed India in the back---- by transfering
military nuclear and missile capabilities to
Pakistan and by their irredentist claims to
Indian territory. No Indian in his right
senses will entertain the Chinese claims to
Arunachal Pradesh or at least to a part of
it in Tawang. The longer the Chinese insist
on Tawang being given to China, the greater
will be the sympathy in the Indian civil
society for the Tibetan cause.
7. India is not among the ill-wishers of
China. It applauds the Chinese economic
miracle. It applauds even more the great
achievements of Shanghai. India wants the
Olympics to succeed and will co-operate in
every possible way with the Chinese
authorities in preventing any terrorist
threat. If the Olympic Games turn out to be
less spectacular than China had wanted them
to be and if the unrest and the global
movement against China continues, the
Chinese will have to blame themselves for
it. Concluded
(The writer is
Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet
Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and,
presently, Director, Institute For Topical
Studies, Chennai. He is also associated with
the Chennai Centre For China Studies.
E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)