Will The Tibetan Issue
Condition - India-China Relations?
by Bhaskar Roy
Unmistakable signals are coming from Beijing
that the Chinese are making the Tibetan
issue and the presence of the Dalai Lama the
central consideration in the India-China
political and strategic relations.
On his return from the China tour earlier
this month, the Indian External Affairs
Minister’s delegation gave out very little
to the media and the public as to what
transpired. In their briefings to the Indian
media in Beijing during the tour the nice
aspects were said – inauguration of the new
Indian Consulate General in Guangdong,
increasing bilateral trade, Indian aid to
the Sichuan earthquake victims for which the
Chinese leaders expressed appreciation, and
the like. Beyond that little else was said.
But the body language did not inspire
euphoria among Indian China watchers, except
perhaps for those who feel the best policy
for India is that of a lackey to China to
counter US “Imperialism”.
Some information filtered out though, and
what was reported briefly gives rise to
concern. One was Chinese Foreign Minister
Yang Jiechi telling the Indian EAM to ensure
that the Dalai Lama is not given space
including by the Indian media. Mr. Yang did
not have the patience to hear out
Mr.Mukherjee’s explanation of the Indian
political system. In fact, he did not care
for it. He just demanded that the Dalai Lama
is not given any exposure in India which, it
can be presumed, included Ministers should
not meet the Dalai Lama even in the latter’s
position of a religious figure.
Next, Mr. Yang taught the Indian delegation
to brush up their history. He emphasized
that the new dispute over the “Finger Point”
on Sikkim-Tibet boundary was administered by
China since 1890. He also lectured the
Indian side that there was difference
between what the Indian border forces were
reporting and what the Central Government
was receiving, suggesting that in the Indian
government the right hand did not know what
the left hand was doing.
It was also reported that the Chinese side
demanded a meeting between the Special
Representatives (SRs) of the two countries
on the border issue soonest possible, may be
in June itself. Almost a directive.
There is a question - why Chinese premier
Wen Jiabao cancelled a pre-scheduled meeting
with Mr.Mukherjee and left for Sichuan to
attend to the imminent breach a huge lake
created by the earthquake? This does not
appear to be a calculated insult. For Mr.Wen,
that was a far more important duty of
national importance to attend. Vice
President Xi Jinping, the anointed successor
of President and Communist Party Chief Hu
Jintao, took his place.
Following the Indian External Affairs
Ministry visit to China, a Pakistani English
language daily carried an article on
India-China relations. Written by a
Pakistani obviously, the article took a wide
swipe at India’s alleged anti-China
predilections and conspiracies. The article
started with India re-opening the Daulat Beg
Oldi (DBG) airport, going to intimate
India-Israel secret military relations at
the behest of the USA to counter China. The
Central point, however, was India with
growing military power acquired from
anti-China countries has already been and
continues to, plot with the Dalai Lama to
split China.
The article, carried by the daily
Pakistan Post of June 13 is not
something seen normally in the Pakistani
media, print or electronic. The words,
phrases, sentiments and allegations in the
article are ever so bluntly a repetition of
Chinese propaganda articles. The article
went so far as to charge that India aided
and abetted the Tibetan uprisings in Lhasa
in March this year in collusion with the
Dalai Lama.
Such an article planted by the China
intelligence agencies is not surprising. It
is done by many intelligence agencies, but
much more subtly. Chinese propaganda,
however, are not known to be subtle when
launching a broadside attack. This article
may be a precursor for more to come, and
even more directly.
The manner in which the Chinese have dealt
with the Tibet issue and the Tibetans,
especially the Dalai Lama in recent months,
has been unfortunate. He is considered the
spiritual head of Buddhists the world over,
and the Chinese assault on him has deeply
hurt the sentiments of Buddhists. There is a
human dignity even for the worst criminal in
the world. By abusing the Dalai Lama, the
Chinese authorities have only won
opprobrium. And this has changed the
character and context of the Tibet issue. As
the Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda
said, the Tibet issue is no longer an
internal matter of China.
On the Tibet issue, India has bent over
backward to accommodate China. But the
Chinese pressure has been relentless,
including suggesting in an official media
comment that India was finally bowing down
to China on the Tibet issue irrespective of
the opinion of its people because good
relations with China was so important for
India.
The tone adopted by the Chinese in their
interactions with the Indian delegation was
a deliberate display of arrogance bordering
on insult, if not insult itself.
It was also made clear that the Dalai Lama’s
residence in India was no longer acceptable
to China. And the border issue including the
Sikkim issue were all linked to the Dalai
Lama, in a very important sense. Increased
pressure on India.
What the Chinese told the EAM should not
have come as a surprise. Most of it was
expected, including their position on Sikkim
which the Chinese are going to turn into
another issue at a time of their own
choosing.
The points made by the Chinese Foreign
Minister have much wider implications in
China’s aggressive policy towards India.
They go beyond bilateral issues and
relations, imposing China’s superiority. The
Chinese media report that India values
relations with China much more than the
popular mood in the country is not one of
appreciation. It is one of superiority, if
read carefully and in the context Beijing’s
positions including summoning the Indian
Ambassador at 2 a.m. in the morning to the
Foreign Office.
The tone of the Chinese statements during
the dialogue should not be allowed to pass.
The Indian policy makers must realize that
two can play at the same game. If the
Chinese are allowed to get away as has been
done in the past, it will be asking for more
trouble in all areas including the borders.
The next Special Representative level talks
on the borders, which discusses many other
issues, can expect overbearing positions
from the Chinese side. Unless, of course,
the Indian authorities adopt their own
legitimate and moral positions. Mr. Yang
Jiechi’s demand to stop the Indian media
from giving the Dalai Lama space, should be
discussed with the contempt it deserves.
Giving any consideration to it would
encourage the Chinese much since it would
seem the Indian government was succumbing to
Chinese threats to the extent of interfering
in the country’s constitution which protects
freedom of speech and the media.
And finally, India should seek foreign
policy channel other than China to pursue
its deserving role in the regional and world
order. Even a blind person can see that at
every turn China has been obstructing
India’s role be it on the UN Security
Council expansion, India-US nuclear deal,
India’s full membership in regional and
trans-regional groupings, improving India’s
relations with it’s neighbours. To use the
often used Chinese phrase, Beijing must be
made to under stand that India will no
longer “stand idly by” if China continues to
counter and encircle India with impunity.
Development of relations with China is a
reality. The same goes for China where India
is concerned. It is high time, however,
India came of it self-imposed “denial mode”
and “accommodation”, and demonstrate it is
not a “soft” or “weak” state.
(The author is an eminent China analyst with
many years of experience of study on the
developments in China. He can be reached at
grouchohart@yahoo.com)