India And Bangladesh Must
Come Together
By Bhaskar Roy
No foreign relations in Bangladesh raises
such a political storm as relations with
India do. This is not new. Bangladesh became
independent in 1971. The people of
Bangladesh paid with their blood to achieve
this goal and correct an incongruous
relationship with West Pakistan or Pakistan
as it is now.
The division of the subcontinent in 1947
which created the two wings of Pakistan,
West Pakistan and East Pakistan was never a
case for common bonding. Problems started in
1948 with the East Pakistanis resenting
cultural and economic domination from the
western wing. The anti-West Pakistan
movement was ignited by the 1952 language
movement in Dhaka, opposing imposition of
Urdu as the main language.
India played a significant role in
Bangladesh’s liberation war, having been
dragged in by the Pakistani army and their
Bangladeshi collaborators launching a
genocidal mayhem on the country. Around
three
thousand Indian soldiers lost their lives,
India bore the burden of hosting around 10
million Bangladeshi refugees, and accorded
substantial assistance to the fledging
nation. Then things began to go wrong.
Certainly, the credit for independence must
go to the Bangladeshis. Their sacrifice is
incomparable. But a question remains on the
outcome of this war if Prime Minister Indira
Gandhi had not intervened. With Pakistan’s
air attack on India, it became an
India-Pakistan war. Some core freedom
fighter organisations in Bangladesh have
been demanding for years national
recognition of Lt. Gen. J.S. Aurora, GOC of
Indian forces in Bangladesh (who accepted
the Pakistani surrender), Field Marshal Sam
Manekshaw, and Mrs. Indira Gandhi. But India
has desisted from involving itself in such
projects for good reasons.
Although Prime Minister Indira Gandhi
withdrew Indian forces from Bangladesh in
the shortest possible time despite dismay
from some Bangladeshi leaders, it was a wise
decision.
The Pakistani army surrendered to Lt. Gen.
Aurora in Dhaka on December 16, 1971. It was
an euphoric occasion. But according to
Indian army officers on duty in Bangladesh,
within the first few months of 1972 they
became targets of children and lumpens on
Dhaka streets shouting “Indian dogs, go
back!’. The significance of this development
cannot be under estimated. It demonstrated
that a section with strong anti-India and
pro-Pakistan feelings had taken deep roots
in the country, despite the move by the new
government to try collaborators and war
criminals. There should be some explanation
as to how these elements were allowed to
function so freely.
The assassination of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujibur
Rahman and family and relatives by a group
of army officers on August 15, 1975 turned
India-Bangladesh relations upside down.
Important questions hang over the real
intentions of freedom fighters like
Maj.Zia-ur-Rehman, Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M.A.
Matin and some others. Zia worked through
the turmoil of the post-Mujibur years to
become the Army Chief, President and founder
of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP),
which is now headed by his widow, Begum
Khaleda Zia. He ensured that the Mujib
killers got diplomatic assignments abroad.
He legalised the banned Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI),
the pro-Pakistan collaborators.
Zia brought India-Bangladesh relation to a
low point till his assassination in 1981.
The BNP-JEI government from 2001-2006, under
Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia, surpassed
even that. Evidence supports the assessment
the BNP-JEI government did everything
possible, even at the cost of the country’s
development, to obstruct India. This
visceral antipathy is rare between close
neighbours, but this was done according to a
plan.
The Awami League (AL) and the grand
coalition led by Sk. Hasina swept to power
at the December 28, 2008 elections on two
grounds. The BNP-JEI had reduced the country
to a Mafia-like fiefdom. And the army kept
itself out from rigging the electoral
process. A third reason, perhaps, was the
focus of the international community on the
elections.
In the last three months, Prime Minister Sk.
Hasina’s India visit has engaged
Bangladesh’s politics. The BNP-JEI with
their alliances are determined to show that
the AL and Sk. Hasina are selling the
country’s sovereignty to India. To them,
Bangladesh’s development is of no concern.
The only objective is to spite India and
join Pakistan as a loose federation.
Sk. Hasina is looking at a much larger
picture of a stable Bangladesh which has to
confront fast growing challenges of economic
development, climate change, and an economic
and trade network with South East Asia for
which the Asian Highway sponsored by the
Asian Development Bank (ADB) is a must.
Leaderships of countries in today’s
globalised world seek to maximise their
country’s development with co-operation with
others, not a zero-sum game. But the BNP-JEI
scuttled the Myanmar-Bangladesh-India gas
pipeline, cutting its own licensed earnings,
to prevent India from getting the Myanmar
gas. They stymied the Asian Highway project
which could bring Bangladesh substantial
transit trade benefit, just to counter
India. The combine also blocked all India
related Bangladesh cooperation which could
advance mainland India’s connectivity with
its North-East region to ensure short
transit linkages did not develop, despite
the fact that Bangladesh would earn transit
fees. These are a few examples which cost
Bangladesh more than India.
It is generally perceived that the Awami
League and its grand coalition comprising
secular, democratic and progressive
political parties are India’s natural
allies. These are the pro-liberation minded
groups who see in India support, development
and stability.
On the other hand, the BNP-JEI combine have
demonstrated that they are natural opponents
of India. The JEI and its students wing
Islamic Chatro Shibir (ICS) were the
Pakistan occupation army’s collaborators.
This has been officially recorded. The BNP,
which was formed in 1978, comprised of old
Jamaat cadres and leaders, some stray
anti-India elements, cold war allies of the
USA and pro-China elements.
The following comparison between the JEI and
BNP is interesting. Just before surrendering
to the Indian forces in 1971, the Pakistan
army and their collaborators, differently
named groups as Al Shams, Razakars and Al
Badrs tried to physically eliminate all
pro-independence leaders and intellectuals
in virtual pogroms. They wanted to leave the
country as leaderless as possible.
In 1975, the group of army officers who
assassinated Sk. Mujibur Rahman and his
family and relations, also mowed down top
leaders of the Awami League who had been put
in jail. The aim was to eliminate the
party’s leadership. President Zia-ur-Rehman
protected these killers.
This is indicative of a serious divide over
India in Bangladesh. Although the BNP and
the JEI were swept out of power at the last
general elections, they have their own
committed supporters and constituencies,
which is not insignificant.
Old ghosts have returned to haunt the JEI
and the BNP. In the Sk. Mujibur Rahman case
12 ex-army officers have been condemned to
death. Five of them are in custody while the
rest are absconding abroad.
The 1971 war criminal trials are going to
commence in February or March. Among the
important listed offenders are top JEI
leaders and at least one BNP leader. The
names of about a dozen Pakistani leaders
also figure in this list, but it is unlikely
the government will press for their
appearance.
Investigations into the attempt on Sk.
Hasina’s life on August 21, 2004 is nearing
conclusion. A senior Awami League leader was
among the 24 killed. Evidence suggest
several BNP leaders including at least one
Minister handled this conspiracy, employing
the terrorist organization, HUJI.
Another case under investigation is April,
2004 illegal arms confiscation case in the
port city of Chittagong. Eight truck loads
of arms brought from a Chinese port, were
landed at the Chittagong port, for transfer
to the ULFA in
Assam. Involved in this operation is a line
up of intelligence heads of Bangladesh and
Pakistan, a Pakistani media company ARY
based in Dubai, around ten former Ministers
and political leaders , and the trail is
leading to the then Prime Minister Khaleda’s
door. There are other serious cases, too.
During the BNP-JEI government, Indian
insurgent groups like the ULFA, NSCN (I/M),
the Manipuris and Bodos were given full
support apart from the assistance from
Laskhar-e-Toiba (LET), HUJI and, finally
Dawood Ibrahim. In brief, the BNP-JEI led
four-party alliance (2001-2006) converted
Bangladesh into a frontline terrorist base
against India.
The record of JEI and the BNP from 1971 was
one of anti-nationalism. By the time the
verdict is announced on these cases they
would earn national and international
opprobrium.
These two parties, pushed to a corner, are
looking for opportunities to open new
questions against the Awami League, to
create a volatile political situation in the
country. The focal point is Prime Minster Sk.
Hasina’s forthcoming visit to India. All
potential India-Bangladesh agreements are
targeted as anti-Bangladesh and a sell out
of Bangladesh’s sovereignty to India. This
is aimed to raise questions on India’s
intention and credibility among the people
of Bangladesh. There is a lot of sensitivity
on both sides of this bilateral relations.
The negativity is there and apprehensions
about a big neighbour are not difficult to
exploit.
The BNP and JEI mouthpiece have already
started misinformation about Sk. Hasina’s
visit, and Indian intelligence agencies
sabotaging Bangladesh’s sovereignty.
Simultaneously, seminars are being held,
marches are being organized, appeals are
being made abroad, against possible
India-Bangladesh agreements on the cards.
Although Bangladesh is power starved, a
possible power purchase agreement is being
dubbed as an Indian trap where India can cut
off supply at will.
It is now India’s call on how to handle Sk.
Hasina’s visit. She has delivered on her
promise to tackle terrorism. While the
process is still ongoing, Islamic
fundamentalism and terrorism which had taken
deep roots will take much more to defeat, if
at all.
It will be wise to put aside contentious
issues for further discussions, while going
ahead with those which are workable. Trade
and transit surface connectivity between
Bangladesh, and Nepal and Bhutan through
India is doable. So is Bangladesh’s power
purchase from Nepal and Bhutan. Better
tariff and access to Bangladeshi products
must also be considered positively.
The issue of adversely possessed enclaves,
especially Dahagram and Angarporta must be
resolved. As a much larger country and
economy, India must accord Bangladeshi
exports special terms. And the Indian Border
Security Force (BSF) should be much less
trigger happy on petty Bangladeshi
smugglers.
India’s large heartedness will take the wind
out of the sails of the Bangladeshi
opponents. This will create space for strong
arguments for the Bangladeshi government to
push through other bilateral agreements. The
entire gamut of issues cannot be resolved
with one issue.
How confident are Sk. Hasina and her team to
execute their Indian policy without
constantly looking over their shoulders. The
latest developments in Bangladesh suggest
there is significant bureaucratic opposition
to fast paced Bangladesh-India good will.
Most of these officers are either JEI or BNP
acolytes or beneficiaries. It is well known
that Prime Minister Hasina’s life is under
constant threat. She is the living symbol of
Liberation, being Sk. Mujibur Rahman’s
eldest daughter. Unless she holds firm she
will lose ground.
Sk. Hasina must return from India with at
least one bag full. The rest can then
follow. But the journey will be arduous.
(The author is an experienced analyst of
South Asian region. He can be contacted at
grouchohart@yahoo.com)