by B. Raman
The Chinese Defence Ministry and
government/party controlled media have
played down the new friction between India
and China over the reported disinclination
of the Chinese Foreign Ministry to issue a
regular visa to Lt. Gen. B. S Jaswal, the
General Officer commanding in chief of
India’s Northern Command, who was to lead
an Indian military team for the fourth
defence dialogue to be held in Beijing. The
Chinese Foreign Office reportedly stated
that he came from the "sensitive location of
Jammu and Kashmir" and "people from this
part of the world come with a different kind
of visa" and suggested that India depute
some other officer for the dialogue. The
Government of India has not agreed to this
and suspended two forthcoming visits by
three Chinese military officers to India ---
two of them for attending a training course.
New Delhi has, however, clarified that the
suspension of military exchanges would not
apply to the periodic trans-border meetings
between military officers posted on both
sides of the disputed border as part of the
confidence-building measures.
2. There is apparently an attempt by both
capitals to keep the temperature under
control and not to allow the friction to
assume a self-sustaining and aggravating
dimension, thereby damaging the over-all
bilateral relationship. New Delhi has
denied press speculation that officials of
China's Ministry of Public Security had
recently removed maps of India exhibited in
the Indian pavilion in the Shanghai Expo
showing Arunachal Pradesh as an integral
part of India. China claims Arunachal
Pradesh as its territory and describes it
as southern Tibet.
3.The Chinese Defence Ministry has sought to
give the impression that India's suspension
of the forthcoming visit of three Chinese
military officers to India did not amount
to a suspension of the broader military
exchanges between the two countries. It said
in a statement: "China has not suspended
defense exchanges with India and has
received no word that India has stopped
military exchanges between the two
countries. " The Chinese Foreign Ministry,
which caused the friction by its
disinclination to issue the visa, has
remained silent till now.
4. There is an attempt by the Chinese to
treat it as a purely visa-related
misunderstanding not having any strategic
significance in relation to the Chinese
position on Jammu & Kashmir and to create an
impression that China has not changed its
position to favour Pakistan and to the
detriment of India. In an article carried on
August 30,2010, the Party-controlled "Global
Times" said: " The Muslim-majority region of
Kashmir is now under control by India and
Pakistan, both of which claim full rights to
the area." A copy of the article is annexed.
(The writer is Additional
Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt.
of India, New Delhi, and, presently,
Director, Institute For Topical Studies,
Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre
For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com)
ANNEXURE
Text of the article carried by the "Global
Times"
Military exchanges intact: China
By Wang Zhaokun
China on Saturday denied reports that it had
halted its military ties with India, saying
it has confidence that both sides will focus
on the broader picture of the bilateral
relations between the two neighbors.
"China has not suspended defense exchanges
with India and has received no word that
India has stopped military exchanges between
the two countries," a statement by China's
defense ministry said.
The statement came after reports in Indian
media that New Delhi had canceled defense
exchanges with Beijing following a visa row
between the two Asian giants.
"China takes developing military ties with
India seriously, and we are confident that
both sides will stay focused on the broader
picture of bilateral ties, acting in a
spirit of consultation and unity to promote
the healthy development of military ties,"
the statement said.
India summoned China's ambassador Friday to
protest against Beijing's refusal of a visa
to B.S. Jaswal, an Indian general who had
intended to visit China for a high-level
defense exchange between the countries.
Indian media said the reason for turning
down the visa to Jaswal is that he is
responsible for Indian military operations
in the disputed area of India-controlled
Kashmir.
The Muslim-majority region of Kashmir is now
under control by India and Pakistan, both of
which claim full rights to the area.
Fu Xiaoqiang, a professor on South Asia
affairs at the China Institutes of
Contemporary International Relations, told
the Global Times that border and military
issues between India and China are quite
sensitive, and both sides should handle them
carefully.
"I don't think the latest visa row between
the two countries will have a big impact on
bilateral relations," Fu said.
This year marks the 60th anniversary of the
establishment of diplomatic ties between
China and India, and China is already
India's biggest trade partner.
However, mistrust remains between the two
large emerging economies due to issues such
as territorial disputes.
"The rise of the two large countries will
definitely bring some clashes. And it will
take some time for China and India to
establish full trust toward each other," Fu
said. "But it is dialogue rather than
confrontation that can improve mutual
understanding."
Agencies contributed to this story