Visit of Kim Jong-IL to China---An
Assessment
By B. Raman
Kim Jong-il, General Secretary of the
Workers' Party of Korea and Chairman of
North Korea’s National Defense Commission,
visited China from August 26 to 30, 2010.
This is his second visit to China this year.
He had earlier visited China in May last.
Underlining the significance of the visit,
the "China Daily" said in an article: "Never
before has Kim paid two visits abroad within
a year."
2. The visit by train was first detected by
the South Korean intelligence and reported
by the South Korean media. Western news
agencies picked up news of the visit from
the South Korean media. The Chinese and
North Korean authorities and the
Government/party controlled media of the two
countries maintained silence on the visit
till the morning of August 30. On the
morning of August 30, the Chinese media for
the first time commented on the reports
carried by the South Korean and Western
media on the visit without confirming that
he was in China. The confirmation came later
that day on the Chinese Central TV after he
had returned to North Korea. The TV reported
that President Hu Jintao had met Kim Jong-il
in Changchun, the capital of the Jilin
province, on August 27. It carried visuals
of the meeting between the two leaders and a
report on a banquet hosted by Mr.Hu in
honour of the North Korean leader.
3. Kim's visit was confined to Jilin and
Heilongjiang, where he visited several
agricultural and industrial
establishments---- reportedly in order to
learn from the Chinese experience in the
modernisation of its economy. In this
connection, the Chinese media referred to a
visit earlier made by him ----without saying
when--- to Vietnam to learn from its
experience in modernisation. Kim visited a
food processing factory, a high-speed train
factory and an elementary school in Jilin
where his father, the late Kim Sung-Il,
had studied in the 1920s.
4. The "China Daily" reported on August 31
that during the talks with Kim President Hu
emphasized that it was a basic experience of
China's reform over the past three decades
that economic development called for
self-dependence but cannot be achieved
without cooperating with the outside world.
Hu reportedly said:” This is the inevitable
path of the times that accelerates the
development of a country.” According to Piao
Jianyi, chief of the Center of Korean
Peninsula Studies at the Chinese Academy of
Social Sciences, Kim indicated that North
Korea's development will be closely
connected with cooperation with China. Piao
was of the view that a major party meeting
next month in Pyongyang might take
important decisions concerning development,
probably by drawing inspiration from China's
experience.
5. Chinese analysts feel that an important
objective of the visit was probably to brief
the Chinese leadership on North Korean plans
for launching a drive for the modernisation
of the North Korean economy. Would that
drive be as ambitious as that of China?
Would North Korea open up to the outside
world---particularly to the West--- as
significantly as China had done post-1978?
Or would the expected North Korean
modernisation and opening-up be in North
Korean colours----more gradual with
continuing suspicion of the outside world?
The answers to these questions are not yet
available. They are unlikely to be available
in adequate measure even after the coming
party meeting next month. North Korea's
evolution into a modern economy would most
probably come about slowly and almost
imperceptibly. There are no indications as
yet that its leadership has overcome its
paranoia of the West----particularly the US.
6. The second objective was to brief the
Chinese leaders about what Kim called "the
rising generation" and to reassure Beijing
that the expected generational changes would
not affect North Korean bonds with China.
Kim was quoted as having stated as follows
at the banquet hosted by President Hu: "With
the international situation remaining
complicated, it is our important historical
mission to hand over to the rising
generation the baton of the traditional
friendship passed over by the revolutionary
forerunners of the two countries as a
precious asset so as to carry it forward
through generations."
7. This strengthened speculation that at
the party meeting next month Kim might
officially indicate his plans for his
succession which might involve the elevation
of his youngest Swiss-educated son (27 years
old) Kim Jong-Un. Why did Kim feel the need
to reassure the Chinese that the "rising
generation" will be as close to China as the
present generation and the preceding one of
his father? Was his visit to the Chinese
school which his father had attended meant
to emphasise the close links of his family
with China and calm possible Chinese
misgivings about the impact of the Swiss
upbringing of Kim Jong-Un on future North
Korean policies?
8. The third objective was to discuss with
the Chinese leadership a possible return of
North Korea to the six-party talks on its
nuclear programme and the sequel to the
sinking of a South Korean naval ship
allegedly by North Korea in March last. The
Xinhua news agency reported that Kim told Hu
that North Korea remained committed to the
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,
and that it "is not willing to see tensions
on the peninsula." According to Xinhua, Kim
said he wished to maintain close
communication and coordination with China in
pushing for an early resumption of the
Six-Party Talks to ease the tension on the
Korean Peninsula, and to maintain peace and
stability there. It quoted Hu as telling Kim
that maintaining peace and stability on the
peninsula accorded with the common
aspiration of the people, and China
respected and supported positive efforts
made by North Korea to ease the situation.
The North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA),
however, made no mention of the remarks
attributed to Kim by Xinhua.
9. Despite these remarks, Chinese analysts
are not optimistic about the chances of an
early resumption of the Six-Party talks. The
“China Daily” has quoted Zhang Liangui,
Professor of international strategic
research at the Central Party School, as
saying as follows: "The US and the DRPK have
different expectations on the talks. While
the US seeks denuclearization of the
peninsula, the DPRK wants to get the UN
sanctions on it lifted.”
10. Chinese analysts described as a surprise
Kim’s leaving Pyongyang for China when
former US President Jimmy Carter was
visiting the North Korean capital to secure
the release of an American, Aijalon Mahli
Gomes, who was sentenced in April to eight
years in jail for entering the country
illegally. Lü Chao, Director of the North
and South Korea Research Center at the
Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, said in
an interview: "Carter has a good reputation
in North Korea. Kim has met him before. But
perhaps Kim missed this meeting on purpose
to show his toughness and send a message
that it will not bow to US pressure after a
series of military drills between the US and
South Korea."
11. Two interesting editorials carried by
the Party-owned “Global Times” on the visit
on August 30 and 31 are annexed.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute
For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate
of the Chennai Centre For China Studies.
E-Mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)
ANNEXURE (“Global Times” editorials)
North Korea's reform and opening-up
(published on August 31, 2010)
The fact that North Korean leader Kim
Jong-il visited China last week was finally
confirmed by the two governments Monday.
Although foreign media continues to
speculate about Kim's "succession plan" and
whether he brought his son along, there are
signs that the North Korean leader is
showing an increasing interest in the
economy.
In his two visits within about a three-month
span, Kim visited a number of cities that
are on the frontier of China's booming
market economy.
Earlier, he also visited Vietnam, and
inspected Russian cities that were
undergoing social transformations.
This points to North Korea having a strong
interest in opening up and developing its
economy. In fact, the country has made
several experimental attempts in the past
decade or two, including setting up a
special economic zone and conducting
currency reform.
It is hard to imagine that any country wants
to stay poor and isolated. The international
community should not marginalize North Korea
out of prejudice.
China's rising economy is taking place just
across a river from North Korea. There is no
reason the North Korean leadership is not
willing to learn from China.
Kim Jong-il's latest visit shows his
attention to the economy has been growing.
The outside world complains that North Korea
has shut itself in. But, they may think
otherwise when they consider the existence
of a South Korea-US alliance, and the fact
that the media in South Korea, the US and
Japan have been openly discussing how to
overthrow the North's rule.
The West always sees North Korea as one of
the world's major threats. But how could a
country like North Korea be strong enough to
launch a "suicide attack" against them?
Living in the shadows of South Korea, Japan
and the US, North Korea has to wrap itself
up tighter in order to fend off military
threats, and threats of political and
cultural infiltration.
North Korea's opening-up will help relieve
tensions in Northeast Asia. But, the knot
does not only lie on the North's side. Other
countries in this region must redouble their
efforts to untangle the knot.
These three nations should not bully North
Korea any more. China should also try hard
to pull North Korea out of its international
turmoil.
If the US does not cooperate, South Korea
and Japan will have to reconsider their
roles. Do they really want to be trapped in
a knot made tighter by the US?
China-North Korea's stable relationship
(published on August 30, 2010)
North Korean leader Kim Jong-il has become a
hot topic in international news media over
the past few days, as they speculate about
Kim's "secret" trip to northeastern China,
and his political mission.
With anonymous sources saying that Kim met
with Chinese President Hu Jintao, and Kim
likely asked Beijing to concur with North
Korea's long-anticipated leadership change,
Western media has also been trying to
illustrate a "special" relationship between
the two countries.
Actually, in today's China, the media seldom
uses the word "special" to describe the two
countries' relations. It does not
necessarily mean China is deliberately
shunning the long historical ties the two
countries share.
Beijing has long made it clear that it aims
to keep the peace on the Korean Peninsula
via a normal China-North Korea relationship.
North Korea has become a marginalized member
of Northeast Asia. When China, South Korea
and Japan compete with each other and become
further involved with each other's
economies, the North is like a forgotten
island.
Many in China have begun to complain that
the isolated North Korea brings too much
trouble for China in international
relations, and the two countries'
relationship should not go back to a
"special" status.
However, as a result of historical and
geopolitical reasons, the current
China-North Korea relationship is not a
simple one. This also explains why Kim
Jong-il visits China frequently.
Every coin has two sides. The China-North
Korea relationship gives other interested
countries too much hope of bringing North
Korea back to the negotiation table over the
North's nuclear weapons program.
The other countries unrealistically expect
China has a strong hand to teach its little
brother a lesson when it gets naughty.
Perhaps they do not know that North Korea
has a strong mind to make its own decisions.
Also, China's diplomatic principle is to not
interfere with another country's internal
affairs.
However, North Korea is an active variable
in Northeast Asia, and keeping a stable
relationship with it will give China an edge
in taking the initiative in international
affairs in this region.
The seeming trouble made by North Korea is
actually a reflection of Cold War
mentalities that separate the Korean
Peninsula into the North and the South, and
the US has a big part in the region's
confusion.
China is not a passive player in Northeast
Asia. A stable relationship with North Korea
does not mean China has to be an enemy of
Japan, South Korea or the US.
As long as China carefully balances
international relations in this region, the
China-North Korea relationship will not
become a negative factor, but a positive
boost toward Northeast Asia's peace and
prosperity.
China will continue to encourage and help
North Korea open up to the world, which will
be conducive to the peace in Northeast Asia.