NEPAL: Constitution Making
and Constitutional Crisis: Options: Update
No.220By Dr. S.Chandrasekharan.
It looks almost certain that the new
Constitution will not be in place by May 28
as stipulated in Article 64 of the Interim
Constitution.
In such an event, what happens to the
government and all the infrastructure of the
government that derive their powers from the
interim constitution. A constitutional
crisis is thus looming large.
Two persons hold the key to resolve this
crisis. One is the President who will have
to take over the state for the interim
period until fresh elections are held again
for an interim constitution. The cycle will
then have to be repeated for a fresh
constitution within a stipulated period. The
second alternative for the President is to
extend the interim constitution by another
six months by an ordinance though the legal
validity for such an action is questionable.
The second way would be for the
parliament formed now under the interim
constitution to amend article 64 of the
constitution. For this a two thirds majority
will be needed and this cannot be done
unless Prachanda helps.
Prachanda has already made it clear that
his party "will in no way help the
government." In a mass meeting at Kathmandu
on 6th April, Prachanda made some
points which are very interesting since
those related to India and the Nepal Army.
He said
* A new constitution and
conclusion of peace process will
still be possible. But for that, the
present government should be
dissolved and a national unity
government is formed. He did not
add, but it is known to everybody
that such a national unity
government will have to be led by
his party.
* His Party has no enmity to
Nepal Army as projected by some
leaders of the ruling parties. He
urged the rank and file of the Nepal
Army to safeguard national
sovereignty and help to make the
peace and constitution making
process successful. This is the
first time that Prachanda has
appealed to the Army directly and
everyone knows that the whole crisis
was created by Prachanda himself by
issuing a "sack order" to the Army
Chief. Strangely Gen. Katuwal now
retired, stated in one of his
interactions later that the Army
will have to come out of the
barracks if there is any violence
consequent on the May 28 deadline
being missed!
* His Party is not anti Indian.
They only want replacement of old
treaties and agreements. He also
said that he was aware of the multi
dimensional and age old people to
people relationship between India
and Nepal. His aim appears to be to
get India out of the constitutional
crisis that is looming and
consequent repercussions!
Baburam Bhattarai in one of the
subsequent meetings declared that his party
is willing to sponsor any other leader of
his party to head the new unity government
if other parties object to Prachanda heading
the government.
It looks that the Maoists are desperate
to find a solution to the constitutional
crisis and are perhaps aware that they more
than anyone else they will be the ones to be
most adversely affected.
In this process, they have separately
initiated a "dialogue" with the second
largest party- the Nepali Congress. On 27th
March senior leaders of both parties- Deuba,
Paudel, Sushil Koirala and K. P. Situala (
the last one known for his closeness to the
Maoists) of the Nepali Congress and
Prachanda, Mohan Baidya, Narayan Kaji and
Bhattarai of the Maoists met to resolve the
contentious issues and timely drafting of
the constitution to take the ongoing peace
process to a logical conclusion. But it was
soon discovered that there are many
fundamental issues relating to the
constitution that will have to be resolved.
The key contentious issues continued to be
on the form of governance, elections system,
structure of legislation, the federal
structure, inter relationship of the
judiciary etc- issues that cannot be
resolved within a short time that is
available.
The calculation of the Maoists was that
if an understanding is reached on the key
issues with the second largest party-the
present government could be dissolved and
perhaps the new constitution or at least the
outline of it could be managed under its
leadership before the deadline.
But Sushil Koirala, the acting Chairman
of the Nepali Congress threw cold water on
these ideas when he declared as recently as
11th of April that there will not
be any change in the government.
Jhalanath Khanal, the Chairman of the
other major party the UML said on the same
day that prior to the promulgation of the
new constitution issues relating to the
integration of Maoist combatants,
dissolution of the YCL of the Maoists and
the return of seized properties of the
Maoists will have to be looked into.
PLA integration is not getting to be easy
either and the pace is very slow. It was
only as recently as 29th March,
that the Special committee for PLA
integration directed its technical unit to
come up with a package for those to be
rehabilitated and those who seek voluntary
retirement.
Meanwhile, steps are being taken for
fresh recruitment in the Nepal Army which is
a clear violation of the peace agreement!
The Maoists are likely to react very
strongly.