Paper no.
3709
|
10-Mar-2010
|
TIBET: Two Years after the Uprising of 2008
By B. Raman
The Chinese are less tense and more relaxed
as Tibet and Tibetans observe the second
anniversary of the uprising of March
10,2008, which started in Lhasa and spread
across the Tibetan areas. They have made
many preventive arrests in Tibet to prevent
anything untoward happening, but the high
tension, which one witnessed last year, is
not there.
2. The Chinese authorities continue to be
more nervous about the situation in
Muslim-majority Xinjiang than in
Buddhist-majority Tibet. Despite the
reported death last month of Abdul Haq al-Turkistani,
the Amir of the Islamic Movement of East
Turkestan (IMET), in a missile strike by a
Drone (pilotless plane) of the US in North
Waziristan of Pakistan, the Chinese
officials in charge of internal security in
Xinjiang are worried over the situation in
the Autonomous Region and are taking no
chances. If the death of Abdul Haq is
confirmed, it is not clear who would succeed
him. So little is known about the
organisational structure of the IMET that it
is difficult to assess what would happen to
the IMET after him.
3. There has been a greater
sophistication in Beijing in the handling of
the Tibetan issue. One no longer sees the
kind of demonisation of His Holiness the
Dalai Lama which one used to see before
March, 2009. The Chinese reacted with anger
to the meeting of President Barack Obama
with His Holiness in the White House last
month, but refrained from talk of any
retaliatory action against the US.
4. The Chinese authorities held a Tibet
strategy session at Beijing from January 18
to 20, 2010. Since the People’s Liberation
Army occupied Tibet in 1949-50, Chinese
leaders are reported to have held five such
strategy sessions under the name the Tibet
Work Forum. The latest session called the
Fifth Tibet Work Forum was reported to have
been attended by about 300 Party, Government
and military leaders playing a role in
policy-making on Tibet.
5. There were three significant outcomes of
the Forum:
-
While continuing to reject the Dalai
Lama's idea of an integration of all the
Tibetan areas of Tibet,Sichuan, Yunnan,
Gansu and Qinghai provinces, they are
now making a distinction between the
problems of governance in the Tibet
Autonomous Region and the problems of
development of the Tibetan minority
living in these provinces. There is an
attempt to approach the development,
religious and cultural problems of the
Tibetans in a comprehensive manner,
wherever they might be living.
-
While continuing to claim that Tibet has
developed considerably under Chinese
rule, there is now an admission that
there is a wide gap between the urban
and rural areas. The development in
Tibet has till now been focused largely
on infrastructure projects. The
beneficiaries of infrastructure-centric
development were the people in the urban
areas. The rural people benefited mush
less. There is now an admission of the
need to develop further the rural areas
in order to improve the quality of life
of the people.
-
The Work Forum led to a decision to
resume the dialogue with the
representatives of His Holiness after a
gap of 14 months. The talks, which were
held in the last week of January,
2010, could not break the deadlock.
Both sides stuck to their respective
position. While the representatives of
His Holiness maintained that the purpose
of the dialogue was to discuss the
future of Tibet and the Tibetans in the
context of His Holiness' demand for
greater autonomy and for the integration
of all Tibetan-inhabited areas in a
single province, the Chinese made it
clear that the purpose was to discuss
the future of His Holiness and not of
Tibet and the Tibetans. However, despite
the deadlock, both sides have kept open
the possibility of more meetings.
6. The opportunity provided by the current
session of the National People's Congress (NPC),
the Chinese Parliament, at Beijing has been
utilised by the Chinese leaders to make it
clear in a media briefing held on March
7,2010, in the margins of the session that
the Chinese Government will have the final
say regarding succession to His Holiness.
Padma Choling, an ethnic Tibetan who was
appointed Governor of the Tibet autonomous
regional government in January, 2010, told
the media briefing as follows: "The
reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan
Buddhism should follow strict historical
conventions and religious rituals. There
have been 14 Dalai Lamas ... It is
unreasonable for him to do whatever he wants
(about reincarnation). There's no way for
him to do so. The 14th Dalai Lama himself
was approved by the Nationalist government,
the then central regime of China."
7. Qiangba Puncog, Chairman of the standing
committee of the Tibet autonomous region's
People's Congress, said at the briefing:
"The reincarnation must meet the traditional
requirements in four aspects: religious
rituals, historical conventions passed on
since the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912), lot
drawing from the Golden Urn in front of the
Buddha Sakyamuni, as well as approval from
the Central Government.
Any claimed reincarnation that fails to meet
all these requirements will be illegitimate
and invalid."
8. Padma Choling ridiculed the Dalai Lama's
indecision on his succession and said: "The
Dalai Lama has previously made a series of
assertions, saying that he might choose his
reincarnation while alive, that he could
stop his reincarnation, that his
reincarnation could be designated, that his
reincarnation could be a female, or that his
reincarnation would be found inside or even
outside China. People don't know which
assertion is what he really wants. There is
currently no need to talk too much about
issues related to the reincarnation of the
Dalai Lama, as he is still alive."
9. The Chinese have utilised the current NPC
session to give a greater political exposure
to the Panchen Lama nominated by the Chinese
Government in 1995 after rejecting the
Panchen Lama designated according to Tibetan
Buddhist traditions by the Dalai Lama. The
Government-designated Panchen Lama is one of
the 13 new members nominated to the National
Committee of the Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference (CPPCC), a top
advisory body with no legislative powers.
10. During his interactions with the
Tibetan delegates to the NPC session,
President Hu Jintao said that political
stability and economic development would be
the keynotes of the Government's policy on
Tibet.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute
For Topical Studies, Chennai. He is also
associated with the Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com)
|
|
Back
to the top
Home
| Papers | Notes
| Forum | Search
| Feedback | Links
Copyright ©
South Asia Analysis Group
All rights
reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for
use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the
author's name are acknowledged. Copies may not be
duplicated for commercial purposes.
|
|