Chinese NPC: Cautious Line on Economy
By B. Raman
Despite the signs of recovery of the Chinese
economy since the last quarter of 2009, the
Government needs to follow a cautious line
till it is satisfied that the recovery is
being sustained and will continue to be
sustainable. That is the message repeatedly
being stressed during the current session
of the National People's Congress (NPC), the
Parliament, being held at Beijing since
March 5, 2010.
2. Even as the session was on, there were
encouraging reports from the foreign trade
front on which the Chinese economy has
depended for its progress till now. The
Customs Bureau of the Chinese Government
reported on March 10, 2010, that exports
went up by 46 per cent in February from a
year before after a 21 per cent increase in
January. Imports increased by 45 per cent in
February as compared to February of last
year. Combined data for January and
February showed that exports surged by 31.4
per cent during the period from a year
earlier. Shipments to other countries
amounted to 94.5 billion dollars, continuing
a 3-month streak of export gains. China's
global trade surplus was $7.6 billion in
February and the combined January-February
surplus was $21.8 billion.
3. These seemingly spectacular increases
were as compared to January-February of 2009
when the foreign trade had come down steeply
due to a steep fall in orders from the US
and the EU countries. What these figures
indicate is that the downturn in exports has
been arrested and reversed, but they do not
indicate a return to the pre-2008 position.
Chinese economists have been cautioning that
it might take at least about three years to
reach the pre-2008 figures and that till
then one cannot claim that the economy has
recovered from the crisis triggered off by
the fall in overseas orders. A reversion
back to the pre-2008 position would depend
not only on the success of the Chinese
policies to deal with the crisis, but also
on the success of the policies of the US and
other countries.
4. Even before the latest Customs figures
were released, Chinese leaders and
officials, who intervened in the NPC
discussions and who briefed the media in the
margins of the session, were cautioning
against any over-optimistic assessments of
the recovery. They stressed the need to wait
till the third quarter of this year before
assessing the sustainability of the
recovery.
5.They said that it would be premature to
consider any withdrawal of the economic
stimulus policy initiated after the onset of
the crisis in 2008 in order to step up
investments in infrastructure projects and
increase the domestic demand to reduce the
dependence on exports. The Central bank
Governor Zhou Xiaochuan said on March 6,
2010, that the policy makers must be "very
cautious" in timing an exit as a world
recovery wasn't yet solid. Commerce Minister
Chen Deming said the same day that it was
too early to say that exports had recovered
from the global financial crisis.
6. Zhu Guangyao, the Assistant Minister for
Finance, said that it would be too early
for the Government to withdraw its economic
stimulus policy and called upon other
countries to coordinate their exit strategy
to strengthen the fledgling recovery. He
added that the global economic situation was
too unpredictable at present to make such a
move. The Government had announced a
586-billion U.S. dollars stimulus package in
late 2008, which was designed to be
implemented in 2009 and 2010. Zhu said: "The
Central Government has taken into
consideration the effect of the global
financial crisis that will continue to be
felt this year. The stimulus policy will
continue, and China will stick to a
proactive fiscal policy and moderately easy
monetary stance."
7. Li Yining, senior economist and a member
of the Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference (CPPCC) National
Committee, warned that it would do the
Chinese economy more harm than good if the
country exited the stimulus package now. He
said: “Recovery in developed countries is
not entrenched; and domestically, although
new orders are increasing, more time is
needed to monitor their sustainability. We
need to wait until at least till the third
quarter of this year to see whether the time
is ripe for an exit."
8. Prime Minister Wen Jiabo told the NPC in
his address on March 5, 2010: " We must not
interpret the economic turnaround as a
fundamental improvement in the economic
situation. This is a crucial year for
continuing to deal with the global financial
crisis, maintaining steady and rapid
economic development and accelerating the
transformation of the pattern of economic
development. This year the main targets we
have set for economic and social development
are increasing GDP by approximately eight
per cent... (and) holding the rise in
consumer prices to around three per cent."
9. A careful reading of the cautionary notes
coming from different leaders and officials
would indicate that they are ruling out any
termination of the present stimulus package
before it is fully implemented by the end of
this year. The recovery since the last
quarter of 2009 would not come in the way of
its implementation. At the same time, they
are not talking of any fresh stimulus
package when the present one is completed by
the end of this year. One could also
discern a note of concern that the recovery
of exports might increase pressure from the
US for a revaluation of the yuan. Hence, the
widely and loudly expressed caution about
the sustainability of the recovery.
10. In the media briefings in the margins of
the NPC session, Chinese policy-makers have
expressed their continued confidence in the
US dollar and emphasized that decisions
regarding continued investments of their
foreign exchange reserves in US Treasury
Bonds would be taken purely on economic and
not on political grounds. The message coming
out is: The decisions regarding investments
in US bonds would be taken by the investing
banks and not by the Foreign Office. There
has been a clear attempt to dismiss
speculation that the decisions of President
Barack Obama to sell more arms to Taiwan and
to receive His Holiness the Dalai Lama could
affect future Chinese investments in the US
bonds.
11. Yi Gang, head of the State
Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE),
the chief currency regulator, reiterated on
March 9 China’s continued commitment to
invest in US Treasuries. He asserted that a
recent unloading of some holdings was simply
part of regular market operations. He added
that the country is diversifying its foreign
investments to spread out risks, and it has
no plan to boost its gold holdings. He made
it clear that China's investment in US
Treasuries is market-driven and should not
be politicized. He said: "The US Treasury
market is the world's largest government
bond market. Our foreign exchange reserves
are large, so you can imagine that the US
Treasury market is very important to us."
12. In 2008 and 2009, the fears among the
policy-makers were over the possibility of
political and social unrest due to the
closure of a large number of factories
depending on exports and the increase in
unemployment. There is now a confidence that
these dangers have been averted through the
stimulus package and through measures for
the restructuring of the economy initiated
in order to depend in future more on
domestic demand than on exports.
13. The present fears as reflected during
the NPC session are over the widening
economic gap between urban and rural
residents, resentment in the interior areas
over the restrictions on their migrating to
the urban areas in order to partake of the
urban prosperity, the increasingly
unaffordable prices of houses which are
creating pockets of resentment in the urban
areas and dangers of uncontrolled lending by
the banks. Till now, the Chinese banks give
the impression of functioning well and no
major bank has run into serious difficulties
due to bad debts. Does this indicate the
true state of the health of the banking
sector?
14. According to the “Global Times”, between
2000 and 2009, China's GDP tripled from 9.9
trillion yuan to 33.53 trillion yuan, while
per capita GDP grew from 7,858 yuan to about
20,500 yuan, putting the country on track
toward becoming the second-largest economy
in the world. However, the increase in
average income contrasts with a widening gap
between urban and rural residents. The per
capita disposable income of urban residents
was 17,175 yuan last year, compared with
5,153 yuan for rural residents, according to
the latest figures from the National Bureau
of Statistics, with the income ratio between
urban and rural residents at 3.33:1, in
comparison to 2.56:1 in 1978. While people
in large cities such as Beijing and Shanghai
have been earning more than 100,000 yuan a
year and buying cars for family use, some
people in remote western areas, such as the
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, can make only
about 2,000 yuan, not even enough to buy a
phone with.More than 40 million people are
living under the poverty line of 2,000 yuan
per year.
15. The Government has this year pledged a
package of measures to improve income
distribution, including increasing farmers'
and rural workers’ income and providing
more support to low-income residents.
Proposals for relaxing curbs on migration
from the rural to the urban areas are also
under consideration.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute
For Topical Studies, Chennai. He is also
associated with the Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)