Intelligence Reforms
By A. K. Verma
(This paper was prepared and published by G-files)
More than 50 years after gaining independence from the
British, Indian Intelligence continues to operate within
the same framework left by the British. The system was
created to deal with problems and requirements of a
different age. Since then we have moved into a new era
where the national security architecture of the world
keeps changing in a kaleidoscopic pattern, creating new
axess of conflicts and conciliations. Times have changed
enormously and the world has become far more complex.
Unfortunately, Indian Intelligence has not kept pace
with the changes.
It is high time that an Indian Intelligence Reforms
Commission is appointed on the lines of the
Administrative Reforms Commission to overhaul the old
system. There are a whole lot of new paradigms requiring
to be considered. If in today’s world intelligence has
become the first line of defense, there is not a moment
to be lost.
The very first reform should be to give Indian
Intelligence the backing of legislative enactments. The
laws should provide a degree of autonomy which frees
intelligence from all bureaucratic restraints and
controls relating to financial management,
administrative functions, pay scales, recruitment,
postings and promotions, hire and fire policies and
enforcement of discipline. The laws should spell out the
charters and authorize the Central Government to fix
broad targets within the charter. This will prevent the
misuse of the institutions by those in authority. The
laws should hold intelligence accountable to the Cabinet
or its Committee for national Security but also create a
parliamentary committee for oversight. Detailed rules
can be worked out to determine the parameters of
oversight and areas of intelligence work over which it
will be exercised in consultation with the Parliament.
Absence of legislative cover is a serious lacuna for
Intelligence. All intelligence work is carried out under
executive instructions but foreign intelligence
operations would involve breaking of local laws of the
country concerned. Neither those who give instructions
for such operations nor those who carry them out are
protected legally under the Indian laws. Institutions
like the CIA of US are created by laws of the US
Congress. All activities which CIA may be required to
carry out are directly or indirectly identified in the
charter legally given. Their operations are thus safe
under US laws but no such protection is available to
Indian operatives, carrying out intelligence tasks in a
foreign country.
Autonomy is essential for non-conventional organisations
to do their jobs. They should be free to hire the best
talent available which will be possible only if a very
superior compensation package is on offer to the
recruit. Today’s intelligence needs require Engineers,
Management Specialists, Economists, Scholars, Scientist,
Sociologists among others, of supreme quality but only
the inferior type wants to make a career in intelligence
because the better type finds the existing compensation
packages totally unattractive. Intelligence services of
other countries are usually the best paid organizations
in those countries. This is the reason why CIA serves as
a magnet drawing in large numbers of PhDs from the best
schools in the US.
In recent years the threats from International terror
has grown exponentially. There are threats of mass
destruction of population and property through use of
weapons of mass destruction, mass disruption of
communications through manipulation of cyberspace and of
mass doctrinal madness through clever selective
religious indoctrination. Such a range of offensive
tactics cannot be countered by keeping intelligence on
the defensive. Intelligence has to be provided teeth to
bite with. It should therefore develop its own cadre of
offensive operators or learn to do so in the company of
select uniformed services. While the major countries of
the world have for long practiced the offensive mode of
Intelligence work, we have lagged behind in India.
Intelligence reforms should open up the possibilities of
covert actions. Use of non state actors by state actors
effectively takes away India’s options to stay neutral
to covert operations. A redefinition of nation’s
security interest will shout loudly for India to give up
its self created soft image and to move out to meet
challenges boldly as they should be.
Intelligence has to acknowledge appearance of new
perspectives following globalization. Fast moving
technologies have made borders meaningless. There is a
new competition for economic penetration. Sovereignties
of nations are at a discount because of these trends. In
the times ahead India will face acute competition from
the other two rising powers of the Asia, China and
Japan. Issues of land, water and climatic changes, all
of which singly or together, lead to mass migrations,
creating demographic imbalances. Who else should study
such phenomenon holistically if not intelligence? Their
database and sharp analysis can contribute to keep the
nations interests secure.
The rising complexity calls for another reform – the
operations and analysis cadres in the intelligence
should be made distinct and separate. When intelligence
needs were few, there may have been a justification for
the two streams to flow as one, but not any longer.
Indian Intelligence has to grow much larger than what it
is today. The value of an analyst lies in the depth of
his studies of his field. The longer he specializes,
greater is the intuitive insight he acquires. Such
knowledge will go waste if he moves to operations.
Naxalism has been identified as the nation’s most
serious problem in the field of national security.
Starting from a single village, Naxalbari, in West
Bengal in 1965, Naxalism is now present in 16 states,
affecting 160 districts. In the context of intelligence
reforms, one must examine why such a growth has taken
place. It would seem that our constitutional scheme by
dividing powers between states and centre has prevented
the latter from formulating and executing a cohesive
policy for the country to battle this problem. If this
situation is not rectified, mere reforms in intelligence
will not take us anywhere.