TERRORISM IN BANGLADESH – Monster Child of
BNP – JAMAAT
By Bhaskar Roy
Immediately following the arrests of David
Coleman Headley,
born as Dawood Gilani, and Tawahur Hossain
Rana, a Pakistan born Canadian citizen, by
the FBI in early November in the USA, the
Bangladeshi security and counter-terrorism
agencies moved to arrest three
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LET) activists who were
planning to attack the Indian High
Commission and the US Embassy in Dhaka.
The connection between the two sets of
arrests is evident. Available information
till now identified the Headley
– Rana duo had targeted
the
newspaper
of Denmark
(which allegedly had insulted Islam) and
various strategic and civilian targets in
India including the National Defence College
(NDC) and other Indian and US targets. Both
had visited India more than once and they
appear to be connected with the LET’s
“26/11” Mumbai attack. Their travel tracks
between India and Pakistan and their
activities and meetings in the two countries
are being investigated.
The LET was primarily created by Pakistan’s
Inter Services Intelligence to target
Kashmir and expanded later to attack other
parts of India. The Americans had backed
Pakistan through the Afghan-Soviet war in
the 1980s, and the USA was a friend. But the
American withdrawal after the war left the
Pak-Afghan region in a mess. Pakistan seized
the opportunity to turn the Mujahidin into
the Taliban. Both the Taliban and the ISI/Pakistani
army hosted Osama bin Laden and his Al
Qaeda. Al Qaeda Islamised the Taliban into
following the intolerant Wahabi line.
Washington
remained non-interfering and tolerant in the
interest of oil and gas transit from Central
Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan. This
created an almost tailor made situation for
Pakistan’s “strategic depth in Afghanistan”
strategy in case of an India-Pakistan war.
The ISI co-opted the Al Qaeda along with the
Taliban.
The ISI/Pak army/Taliban/Al Qaeda team makes
for a complex issue. But at the root of this
potpourri is General and President
Zia-ul-Haq’s vision of creating a
conservative Islamic society where the
intelligence, security forces and the army
would be the guardians of his ideology. At
the bottom line: the creation of Bangladesh
with India’s involvement had to be avenged.
While sections in Pakistan’s civil society
and press have begun to realize the
expectations of a globalized world, the
monster created by Zia-ul-Haq’s vision has
grown hugely and is threatening to devour
the country. Unfortunately, sections in the
ISI and the army still remain wedded to the
old idea.
The September 11, 2001 (9/11) Al Qaeda
terrorist attack in USA changed much of the
picture. The Americans are aware and
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly
made it clear during her Pakistan visit in
early November this year, that important
sections in the Pak army, the ISI and the
establishment are hand in gloves with the
Taliban and Al Qaeda.
The LET, the strongest ISI terrorist front
organization headed by Hafeez Mohammad
Sayeed, are not permitted to attack American
assets inside Pakistan. Although the US has
imperative strategic interest in Pakistan, a
major attack on the US Embassy in Islamabad
may very well precipitate devastating
punitive action from the US. Therefore, a
conducive country had to be found where the
US could be targeted under cover. Bangladesh
was tailor made, with an existing base which
launched terrorism in India.
A significant number of Bangladeshis had
fought as mercenaries in the Afghan-Soviet
war. Trained in camps in Pakistan under the
ISI, and in Afghanistan under the Taliban,
some also fought in Palestine, some in
Chechnya. Almost all of them returned to
Bangladesh, they returned as emissaries of
the ISI/Taliban-Al Qaeda team, and the ISI-LET
became the controlling agent.
Since its birth in 1971 in a bloody struggle
against Pakistan, Bangladesh underwent a
series of upheavals, coups and revolts after
the assassination of its founder and
President, Sk. Mujibur Rahman, on August 15,
1975. Between August and November 1975 those
perceived to be pro-India whether
politicians, military officers or
intellectuals were massacred. The USA and
the West looked at these developments
benignly. It was the era of the cold war –
US-Pakistan-China axis versus the
India-Soviet partnership vibrating
discordantly in the region.
Major Zia-ur-Rehman, a Bengali in the
Pakistan army, apparently a freedom fighter
in Bangladesh’s liberation war against
Pakistan in 1971, was the main usurper of
the country’s freedom and beneficiary of Sk.
Mujib’s assassination. Although he died in
another coup in 1981, he formed the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). He
brought the anti-liberation and pro-Pakistan
group, the Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) and their
linked organizations back from political
banishment. These people had collaborated
with the Pakistani army in Bangladesh, and
were responsible for the rape and massacre
of thousands of Bangladeshis.
The BNP, during its tenure in government
from 1991 to 1996, and 2001 to 2006 in
collaboration with the JEI and two other
parties, turned Bangladesh into a country
run by terrorists and Islamic extremists.
The entire Pakistan establishment was their
mentor, and the BNP/JEI combine with other
obscurantists like the Islami Oikyo Jote (IOJ)
became the executors.
To start with, the common enemy was India,
mainly because of India’s role in the birth
of Bangladesh. But they raised the
anti-India tirade into a national agenda and
a Pakistan sponsored Wahabi Islamic
sentiment had to be introduced. History was
distorted in text books to suggest that the
1971 war was fought against India.
Capturing power by whatever means in a small
developing country through election, is
understandable. Even extending the hold by
some means through democratic sham would
still be somewhat hands off from the
international community. But if the powers
that be take to terrorism and encouragement
of religious extremism that can hurt the
international community especially when it
is fighting terrorism, makes for another
evaluation.
There are three major criminal and
anti-national cases in Bangladeshi courts
which are likely to come to a conclusion in
a few months.
One is the Sk. Mujibur Rahman assassination
case in which the main perpetrators of the
crime are going to receive their sentences,
with the verdict scheduled for November 19.
The aftermath may witness some bloodshed
from among the ruling Awami League.
The other is the trial of the assassination
attempt on Awami League President and
current Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, elder
daughter of Sk. Mujibur Rahman, on August
21, 2004 at a party rally. The grenade
attack killed 24 Awami League leaders and
cadres and injured scores of others. Sk.
Hasina was also severely injured. This
attack took place at the height of BNP-JEI
led four party alliance government.
The under trials include
Harkatul-Jihad-al-Islami, Bangladesh, (HUJI-BD)
Commander Mufti Hannan who conducted the
attack; Harris Choudhury, BNP Chairperson
and Prime Minister Khaleda Zia’s political
advisor; Abdus Salam Pintu, Deputy Minister
in the BNP – JEI government and a close
friend of Khaleda Zia’s all powerful son
Tareque Rehman; Moulana Tajuddin, leader of
the Bangladesh chapter of the LET and
brother of Pintu; Luftozzaman Babar,
Minister of State for Home Affairs in the
BNP-JEI government and a close friend of
Tareque Rehman and an acolyte of Begum
Khaleda Zia, among others.
It is to note that David Headley
was in close touch with Ilyas Kashmiri, the
head of the Pakistani HUJI and mentor of
HUJI-BD. Kashmiri, who is from Pakistan
occupied Kashmir (POK), was groomed by the
ISI and the Pakistan army for Jihad in
Indian Kashmir. But the two sides have
fallen out at least, officially.
The third case is that of interdiction
(accidentally) of ten truckloads of arms at
the Fertilizer Jetty at the Chittagong Port
in April 2004. The huge quantity of arms
including rocket launchers, were meant for
North-East Indian militants, the United
Liberation Force of Assam (ULFA). Had this
consignment reached its destination, the
mayhem in Assam and other areas in that
region can be imagined.
The ongoing investigations into this case
have already exposed a virtual terrorist
organization resting at the heart of the
BNP-JEI led government. It was waging a war
of terror against India along with
collaboration and assistance from the
Pakistani government. Almost the entire top
leadership was hosted by Dhaka. Other Indian
insurgents also had access and residency in
Bangladesh.
The conspiracy footsteps go to the highest
level of the BNP and JEI involving BNP
senior Joint General Secretary Tareque
Rehman, and the JEI Amir Motiur Rehman
Nizami, who at that time was the Industries
Minister and controlled the Chittagong
Fertilizer Jetty. Former top intelligence
officers from the Director General of Forces
Intelligence (DGFI) and the National
Security and Intelligence (NSI), including
their former heads are in custody today
undergoing interrogation. Lutfozzaman Babar,
Prime Minister Khaleda Zia’s political
adviser, Harris Choudhury and others were
also involved and are being questioned. The
scale and reach of this conspiracy suggest
that Prime Minister Khaleda could not have
been unaware of it.
It is well documented that Tareque Rehman
was the godfather of Islamic extremists like
Khatme Nabuwat Movement, the Jamatul
Mujahidin Bangladesh (JMB) and some others.
Prime Minister Khaleda Zia openly said in
2004, that there was nothing like the JMB
and it was media creation. She was also
involved in covering the terrorists.
The most revealing aspect of the
investigation directly links with the
JEI-HUJI conspiracy today in Bangladesh. The
ISI was directly involved in arranging the
procurement and delivery of this arms
consignment as was Dubai based ISI’s front
media company the ARY. The ARY was a money
transfer company for the Taliban and the Al
Qaeda, according to reports. Finally, was
the introduction of ISI controlled
underworld don, Dawood Ibrahim in this
project. The D-company arrived in
Bangladesh.
The basic network of the LET, HUJI and
others were laid from the mid-1990s. They
were politically important for the BNP and
JEI to fight the Awami League and other
secular nationalist political parties.
Attacks on the life of Sk. Hasina started in
April 2001. The person entrusted for this
job from the beginning was HUJI commander,
Mufti Hannan, who also led the August 21
attack. Interestingly, the grenades used for
the ‘August 21’ attack were Arges grenades
made in Pakistan, and part of the Chittagong
consignment. Babar has confessed to this,
proving they were pilfering from the
confiscated consignment. These same grenades
were used in the attacks which killed Shah
AMS Kibria, and injured British High
Commissioner to Bangladesh Anwar Choudhury,
and others.
Those arrested in the planned attacks on the
Indian High Commission, the US Embassy and
some eminent persons, reveal that the LET
and HUJI are working together in Bangladesh.
One of the LET handlers arrested is Maulana
Tajuddin, brother of BNP Deputy Minister
Pintu, who is also in custody. Another is
HUJI leader Abdul Majid.
Three Pakistani LET activists have also been
arrested, but the detective bureau suspects
about 30 have come from Pakistan, and are
being protected by their Bangladeshi
counterparts. One of those arrested by DB,
Madrassa teacher Mufti Harun, confessed to
his interrogators that Hafiz Mohammad Sayeed,
the founder of the Pakistan LET and the
Jamaat-ud-Dawa, had instructed him over
telephone to attack the US Embassy in Dhaka.
Hafez Sayeed is an accused in Mumbai
terrorist attack “26/11”, but the Pakistani
establishment fear to touch him.
The BNP-JEI government allowed several Al
Qaeda connected foreign NGOs like the Al
Harmain Foundation of Saudi Arabia and the
Revival lslamic Heritage Society (RIHS) of
Kuwait to set up base in Bangladesh and
bring in money to fund jihadists in the
country. A research report developed in
Bangladesh in 2005 says there were 125
Islamic organizations functioning under
NGO cover that were either militant or
supported militancy. Their ideological
tenets were controlled either by the rigid
Moududism, or JEI, or ISI controlled
Wahabism.
What is necessary is to recognize urgently
that the Islamic militancy or terrorism has
networked globally, but the epicentre is
still located in Pakistan.
Like its ‘strategic depth’ strategy in
Afghanistan, Pakistan believes in waging
India-centric low intensity war from
Bangladesh. The US has been a more recent
inclusion in the Pakistani/ISI perception.
Sk. Hasina, as the elder daughter of Sk.
Mujibur Rahman is the living symbol of the
breakup of Pakistan with the liberation of
Bangladesh. If she is eliminated, part of
Pakistan’s insult of 1971 will be avenged.
The bottom line is that the BNP-JEI
government not only raped the country
financially, not that some others have been
innocent, but became a state sponsoring
terrorism. Prime Minister Sk. Hasina
declared that eradication of terrorism was
on the top of the agenda. She lived up to
her words. She has also called for a
regional approach to counter terrorism. It
is time that the international community, in
its war against terrorism, co-operate
closely with the government of Bangladesh.