CHINA:
Encouraging Public Clamour, but Avoiding
Over-Reaction By State
By B. Raman
In their reaction to
the decision of President Barack Obama to go
ahead with the sale of a new arms package to
Taiwan, the Chinese authorities have been a
following a dual tactics similar to what
they had done before the Beijing Olympics of
August 2008, when there was a threat of a
boycott of the opening ceremony by some
Western countries such as France over the
issue of human rights in China.
2. This dual tactics
consisted of encouraging a public clamour
for strong retaliation against the West
through sections of China’s media and
Internet users in the form of boycott of
Western goods, while the State itself sought
to convey an impression of acting with
restraint despite the perceived provocation
from the West and the demands from the
public for strong retaliation. The Chinese
tactics worked. There was no boycott.
3. In reacting to the
decision of the Obama Administration to go
ahead with the long-pending arms sale to
Taiwan, the Chinese have been encouraging
their party and Government controlled media
units such as the “Global Times” and the
“China Daily” to demand strong action
against the US companies such as Boeing and
Lockheed Martin, which, inter alia,
manufacture some of the weapons and military
equipment, which are proposed to be sold to
Taiwan, while the Government itself has till
now restricted its retaliation to suspending
military exchanges with the US, while
talking of the available extra option of
sanctions against the US companies.
4. At the same time,
the Chinese have carefully avoided any talk
of a wider retaliatory action such as
suspending fresh investments in the US
treasury bonds or even reducing their
current holdings in the US bonds, which
might damage the US economy.
5. The present Chinese
concerns are confined to two issues:
Firstly, securing a commitment from the US
that there will be no more arms sales to
Taiwan even if the present package is not
re-considered under Beijing’s pressure and,
secondly, to ensure that Mr.Obama does not
revert to the past policies of the Clinton
and Bush Administrations of maintaining
interactions with His Holiness the Dalai
Lama under some cover or the other. The
Chinese have been sending out warnings that
if Mr.Obama receives His Holiness during his
visit to the US later this month, they would
find it even more difficult to resist public
clamour for a strong retaliation against the
US than today.
6. While deciding on
the appropriate options available to
Beijing, the Chinese authorities are keen
that the escalation of rhetoric on the
Taiwan and the Dalai Lama issues does not
damage China’s economic linkages with the
US. The present Chinese economic recovery is
largely due to their pumping money into
their market in order to boost the domestic
purchase of manufactured goods to compensate
for the loss of overseas orders,
particularly from the US. The Chinese
realize that the continued recovery of their
manufacturing sector would depend on the
recovery of the US economy and the
resumption of the flow of large orders from
the US. They do not want to take any hasty
action which could reverse the present trend
towards economic recovery.
7. If China has a
credible weapon against the US in the form
of its bond holdings in the US, the US has
an equally potent weapon against China in
the form of the dependence of the Chinese
manufacturing sector on the US market. The
Chinese Government will therefore continue
to be measured in its reaction while letting
the public clamour for even stronger action
continue for some time.
(The writer
is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet
Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and,
presently, Director, Institute For Topical
Studies, Chennai. He is also associated with
the Chennai Centre For China Studies.
E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)