Indo-Pak Interactions: Need to Expand Basket
of Issues of Concern
By B. Raman
Since the beginning of this week, the
Government of India has initiated two moves
to expand the scope of the interactions with
the Government of Pakistan, which have
remained stunted since the 26/11 terrorist
strikes by the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET) in
Mumbai. The terrorist attacks brought the
structured, formalized composite dialogue on
the various issues coming in the way of the
normalization of bilateral relations to a
state of suspension. They did not interrupt
the normal official interactions between the
two Governments. However, these have
remained in low key with no new ideas or new
initiatives.
2. While not making any substantive move to
resume the composite dialogue despite
repeated demands to do so from Pakistani
leaders and entreaties in the same direction
from the US, the Government of India has
initiated two moves to re-vitalise the
interactions at the political and
professional levels, presumably in order to
test the waters for a resumption of the
composite dialogue process at a later stage.
3. The first move----at the political
level--- is the decision that Shri
P.Chidambaram, the Home Minister, should
participate in the SAARC Home/Interior
Ministers’ conference, which is scheduled to
be held in Islamabad later this month, and
hold bilateral discussions in the margins of
the conference with Mr.Rehman Malik, his
Pakistani counterpart. There has been no
high-level political visit since 26/11.
4. The bilateral discussions, if approached
seriously by the two Governments, should be
useful in exchanging notes on the progress
of the investigation and prosecution of the
26/11 conspiracy by the LET and in laying
the groundwork for establishing a tradition
of mutual legal assistance between the
principal investigation agencies of the two
countries. This has to be a political
decision and only the two Ministers would be
able to take such a decision.
5. Mr.Malik has been a trusted associate of
President Asif Ali Zardari and was a
confidante of the late Benazir Bhutto since
1996. Though his relations with Prime
Minister Yousef Raza Gilani and the
military-intelligence establishment are not
very good, he should be able to speak with
authority on behalf of Mr.Zardari. Moreover,
he is an ex-police officer, who had held a
senior position in Pakistan’s Federal
Investigation Agency, which, inter alia,
investigates and prosecutes major
terrorism-related cases He has more the
mindset of a Pakistani police officer than
of an army officer and has not been known
for obsessive anti-India feelings.
6. The second move---at the professional
level---- is the reported invitation by Shrimati
Nirupama Rao, our Foreign Secretary, to her
Pakistani counterpart Mr.Salman Bashir, to
visit New Delhi on mutually convenient dates
“to discuss terrorism and any other issue
that could lead to peace between the two
neighbours” as reported by the media.
7. While there should be no problem with
regard to Shri Chidambaram’s visit to
Islamabad and his bilateral discussions with
Mr.Malik, it remains to be seen whether the
Pakistani Foreign Office would go along with
the wording of the reported invitation which
does not make any reference to a resumption
of the composite dialogue. There is a
possibility though that the US will strongly
nudge Pakistan to respond positively to the
invitation without insisting on a reference
to the composite dialogue.
8. There has been some valid criticism from
sections of the New Delhi-based community of
retired officers of what they view as the
haste shown by the MEA in rushing with the
invitation instead of waiting to see what
transpires during the Home Minister’s visit.
I subscribe to this criticism.
9. Now that an invitation has reportedly
been issued, we have to examine what should
be the agenda of the proposed interactions
between the two Foreign Secretaries if
Pakistan responds positively. While re-vitalising
these interactions, it should be our
endeavour to expand the basket of issues of
concern to India, which have arisen since
the format of the composite dialogue was
agreed upon when Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee
was the Prime Minister and which are not
discussed specifically now.
10. While the issue of mutual legal
assistance between the principal
investigation agencies should be the concern
of the two Home/Interior Ministers, there
are two other issues, which should be
brought within the scope of the interactions
between the two Foreign Secretaries. These
are the continuing threats to the security
of the Indian diplomatic missions in
Afghanistan and Bangladesh from
Pakistan-based terrorists and action by
Pakistan to neutralize those threats and the
dangers of Al Qaeda and its associates
getting hold of weapons of mass destruction
material and how to prevent them.
11. Pakistan’s initial reaction to the
addition of these issues could be negative,
but that should not discourage us from
raising them.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute
For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)