Note no. 205

19. 11. 2003

Sri Lanka: The Norwegians declare a "halt" in assisting the peace process: Update 55.

by Dr. S. Chandrasekharan 

"Sri Lanka needs leaders, not bickering kids."

"Most Sri Lankans are embarrassed and shocked that two people that they have looked up as ‘leaders’ are worse than two spoilt, selfish, self centered children who think that the world should pander to them." - An exasperated citizen from the majority community.

"The crisis and confusion in the South have undermined the trust the Tamil people had in the peace process." - Thamil Selvan of LTTE.

In the political crisis that ensued the sacking of three ministers holding key portfolios by the President, the Norwegian representatives consisting of the Norwegian Deputy Foreign Minister Vidar Helgesen and the special envoy Eric Solheim dashed to Sri Lanka in the hope of saving the peace process. (Refer our update 54).

They met both the Prime minister and the President at Colombo, then visited Killinochi and met the LTTE leader on 13th November. The LTTE while recalling the historical past where the Sinhala side had back tracked on some ground or other from past agreements, expressed their disappointment over the developments that had brought about an "undesirable situation". Prabakaran specially mentioned about the safety of his political cadres in areas under the control of Sri Lankan security forces.

While the meeting with the LTTE ended in a cordial manner, surprisingly the next day the Norwegian Dy. Foreign Minister called a press conference and declared Norway’s intention to keep away from the peace process until the political situation clears up. He made three points which were all very valid. There have been criticisms both from the Sri Lanka and the Indian media on the action of the Norwegians, but it should be remembered that Norwegians having shown extraordinary patience till now will have to get assertive some time to ensure that the Sinhala majority puts their political house in order if they are to proceed with the peace process in all seriousness. The points were

* The resumption of peace talks is seriously impeded and it will be much more difficult to sustain it in a political vacuum.

* There is no clarity as to who is holding political authority and responsibility on behalf of the government to the continuation of the cease fire agreement and the resumption of peace negotiations.

* Until such clarity is re-established, there is no space for further efforts by the Norwegian government to assist the parties.

The President and Prime Minister met twice on the 12th and 18th November with their aides.

It was a good sign that the two leaders President Chandrika and Prime Minister Wickremasinghe were willing to meet and discuss the current political crisis.

In the first meeting Prime minister Wickremasinghe made the point that he cannot continue the peace process without the Defence portfolio under his control and if need be the President can take over and continue the peace process. The President on the other hand suggested the formation of a government of "National reconciliation and reconstruction" with members from both parties to continue the peace process. No headway was made in the meeting.

Subsequently informal discussions were held by the Aides of the two ( which is also a good sign) and some tentative progress was made in the second meeting. In this meeting it was agreed to appoint a committee of officials to work out the details of a future working arrangement under which the President and the Prime Minister could work together on issues of national importance. It is still not clear whether the two agreed to have a common approach to the now stalled peace process. At any rate it is a good beginning as at least the two leaders are on talking terms!

The SLMM has declared that the Cease fire agreement is still in place: As expected, while the Norwegians have withdrawn from the peace process temporarily, the Sri Lankan Monitoring mission has clarified that the cease fire agreement is still in place and that the 50 odd members of the team would continue to do their duties vigorously. Their spokesperson Agnes Bragadottor made this clear in a conference. On the ground, reports show that the security forces and the LTTE have continued their internal meetings and have generally cooperated.

The Buddhist clergy while not taking sides has called for the formation of a national government to solve the present crisis. The powerful Malawatte Mahanayake Thera said that all the political parties including the two major parties should work together. Prime minister Wickremasinghe is reported to have met the clergy separately and has assured them that in principle he would support a national front to revive the stalled peace process.

The Catholic Bishops have jointly appealed to the President and the Prime minister and other leaders of political parties to seriously consider an immediate resolution to the problem through dialogue and compromise.

Sri Lankan Parliament meets: After the statutory period of prorogation expired, the Sri Lankan Parliament met today. The Parliament had to meet to pass the budget but most of the time was taken up in discussing the prorogation of the parliament by the President. The Speaker ruled that the action of the President was undemocratic. He said that the President had no authority to suspend Parliament without the concurrence of the legislature and that he would disregard any future attempt to disrupt the legislature.

Conclusion: We had always maintained that unless the two major parties come together and make a serious common approach to the ethnic problem, there could be no peace in the island. We had also cautioned that if the peace talks were to be derailed it would be more due to the differences between the two major parties of the Sinhala community and if the past experience is any indicator the present cease fire process would also go the same way as before. One cynic while commenting on the Tamil ethnic question said that the Tamil problem will be solved either when an independent ‘Eelam’ is formed or when the last Tamil leaves the North East for Canada! There is no need here to elaborate on this issue further.

Back to the top

Home  | Papers  | Notes  | Forum  | Search  | Feedback  | Links

Copyright © South Asia Analysis Group 
All rights reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the author's name  are acknowledged. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes.