SRI LANKA: Current Situation: the broad
picture- Update 70.
by Dr. S. Chandrasekharan
Despite several visits of special envoys of both Norway and
Japan, the peace process continues to be stalled. The Japanese
special representative Yasushi Akashi has just visited Colombo
after meeting the officials and the political leaders in an
effort to restart the process. He also completed the usual task
of briefing the Indian officials at Delhi on his return! And
nothing more!
The Tokyo meet and the expectations:
The Tokyo Donors meet between 9 and 10 June, 2003 besides
officially bringing Japan into an active role into the peace
process naively thought that in pledging a large amount, the
political settlement will be quickened. We had mentioned then
that in our opinion the assessment of donor countries including
USA represented by Richard Armitage may go wrong. (Update 48).
The absence of LTTE in that conference and their quick
denunciation of the declaration as not binding on them were not
understood by the donors then and even now.
We had also pointed out that the donors had probably assessed
that with the reconstruction in place in the north and east, the
LTTE will be more amenable to a softer approach towards a
political settlement and that the people themselves may demand
of LTTE to do so. We had said that the people are in no position
to influence LTTE to give up any of their avowed political
goals. It may be out of fear or admiration but the fact remains
that the LTTE is uni focussed on their goals. There is no other
agenda for them whereas the Sri Lankan government, various
political parties, the clergy and the non LTTE groups have
multiple agenda and they are lost in their own internal
contradictions
Balasingham in one of his letters before the Tokyo
declaration had said that a permanent political solution through
a radical transformation, is not possible under the then
unstable political environment created by the "dual
ferociously opposed power centres in Colombo." Now a third
party, the JVP has emerged after the general elections and the
recent provincial elections ( Note 231-
update 66) give an indication that the party is on the rise.
Now the contradictions have multiplied.
The Ground Realities:
Recently a seminar was held in Delhi where a fair
representation of political leaders, journalists, analysts and
ex army officers of Sri Lanka were present. There were many
Indian analysts too. What struck us was the failure of most of
those present to come to grips with the ground realities in Sri
Lanka. There were many scholarly formulations and nuances to
take the peace process forward, but that did not take into
account that-
* The LTTE is in total control of two of the districts,
Killinochi and Mullaithivu and the Sri Lankan government has
been shut out totally in the two districts. They have their
own policemen, courts, customs, judiciary sections, their own
banks and taxation systems. This is the reality. Any move
towards a political solution will have to take into account
this reality and it will take a long time. That is why we had
said repeatedly (updates 67 & 69) that the Sri Lankan
government should start the talks on the ISGA proposals and
sooner the better.
* Another point which has failed to come to the notice of
the analysts is that the LTTE is in no position to begin talks
on political issues. Instead of bringing them out to talk on
ISGA which has certain inbuilt core issues, the Sri Lankan
side is delaying the talks on one issue or other. The latest
we hear is that they have a counter proposal.
* Similarly the GOSL ( Government of Sri Lanka) is unable
to forge a consensus of the south ( or in whatever name one
may call it- call it the Sinhala majority) on the political
package they are willing to give to meet the just aspirations
of the Tamils after taking into account the ground realities.
This, the Sri Lankan side will never be able to do, not
withstanding the pious understanding reached in the third Oslo
meeting that the parties "agreed to explore a solution
founded on the principle of internal self- determination of
the Tamil-speaking peoples based on a federal structure
within a United Sri Lanka." This understanding
would have been enough to discuss the ISGA, but the
opportunity is being lost.
* The LTTE’s goal is Eelam. They have also assessed that
the majority community would get bogged down due to internal
squabbles and would never be united in providing any
meaningful autonomy. All the Tamil groups are aware of this
position. Now the LTTE’s position is getting hardened and
Balasingham is said to have declared that there was no
"unconditional abandonment of the right to
secession." in the Oslo talks!
* Now there is peace with violence. This may look a
contradiction, but it is so. No one is safe in the east and
even in Colombo one finds leaders and party workers of non
LTTE groups unable to venture out freely without proper
precautions. The Karuna affair on which we would discuss later
also added to the tense atmosphere. There are mutual killings
in the east and the LTTE has been boldly announcing executions
of Karuna’s men. There have been heavy casualties on the
LTTE side also that are unreported. Surprisingly the SLMM (
Sri Lankan Monitoring Mission) has taken the stand that it is
an internal matter of LTTE.
* Unfortunately the cease fire agreement itself was heavily
loaded in favour of the LTTE. By disarming other non LTTE
Tamil groups and the absence of mention of Killinochi and
Mullaithivu districts in the agreement and by giving a sense
of parity or balance of power between the opposing parties,
the LTTE has been provided full legitimacy. It is too late in
the day to redraft the agreement as some people suggest, but
the killings in Colombo and elsewhere in non LTTE areas will
have to stop. The Sri Lankan security forces will have to be
more vigilant. It was not surprising that the LTTE team which
went to Geneva and later to Austria and Netherlands were told
in clear terms of their human rights violations and
recruitment of child soldiers.
The Karuna Affair and its impact:
Going back to the Delhi meet, it looked that there was
expectation all round that the Karuna affair would weaken the
LTTE to such an extent that the LTTE’s position vis a vis the
peace talks would weaken and it would be more amenable. On the
other hand, the official circles in Sri Lanka have claimed that
the LTTE would never come for talks until they gain supremacy in
the east. In fact we felt that it was one of the reasons why the
GOSL was dragging its feet to re start the negotiations.
On Karuna’s breakup with the LTTE, we have the following
observations:
* The LTTE was never strong in the east until the nineties.
It was Karuna who built up the LTTE forces in the east and
there is extensive sympathy for Karuna.
* Politically it will take quite sometime for the LTTE to
build up its presence in the east. The removal of Rajesh an
easterner with a northerner has not gone down well. Reports
indicate that in fresh recruitment, the LTTE has been
rejecting a large number of people from the east!
* This does not mean that the LTTE will be militarily
weakened and the expectation that the Karuna affair would
bring around the LTTE in the peace talks is misplaced.
* Another wishful thinking is that the Tamils will be
satisfied with a separate north and east with Karuna breaking
away from the LTTE.
* Having given up arms and the 5000 and odd cadres he had,
if Karuna is still fighting and causing casualties to the
LTTE, he cannot do on his own. Who is helping him? Karuna is
also aware that it was the Sri Lankan Army which permitted the
LTTE forces in the first place to cross through the GOSL lines
to attack Karuna’s front line fighters at Verugal. Karuna
cannot therefore be used beyond a certain point.
Conclusion:
With known positions of both GOSL and the LTTE it will take a
long time for the peace talks to find a solution acceptable to
all communities as the Oslo meeting said. What is important now
is to ensure that the cease fire is carried on despite the
hiccups and an interim administration is in place soon. ISGA is
not the final word and it can never be. But it has to be
discussed.