 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Paper no. 1193
20. 12. 2004
by B.Raman
( Text of the comments sent by the author on December 19,2004, in reply to a query from an Italian journalist regarding possible Pakistani nuclear assistance to Saudi Arabia)
The late Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto projected to Saudi Arabia, Iran and Libya Pakistan's project for an atomic bomb as a project for an Islamic bomb to counter what he used to call the Christian, Jewish and Hindu bombs and persuaded them to share the cost of the project. While the exact amounts paid by these countries are not available, the major share came from Saudi Arabia and Libya and a smaller amount from Iran.
2 . While the flow of funds for the Islamic bomb project was substantial and regular from Saudi Arabia and Libya, it was sporadic from Iran. It was regular till 1979 when the Shah of Iran was in power. After the success of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, the US and some other Western countries imposed economic sanctions against Teheran. The US froze all Iranian assets in US banks. The Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s aggravated Iran's economic difficulties. Saudi Arabia, a Wahabi State, was extremely suspicious of the Shia revolutionaries of Iran. Gen.Zia-ul-Haq, who overthrew Z.A.Bhutto in 1977 and seized power, was himself worried over the radicalisation of the Shias of Pakistan, who constitute about 20 per cent of the population, following the success of the Shia revolution in Iran. The US was interested in the success of Iraq in its war against Iran and would have viewed adversely Pakistan hobnobbing with Teheran and adding to its military muscle.
3. All these factors slowed down the flow of money from Iran, but not Iran's interest in benefiting from Pakistan's experience and military nuclear technology. After the end of the Iran-Iraq war, Iran's economic position once again improved and the flow of money to the Pakistan project increased and continued.
4. When Z.A. Bhutto and other Pakistani leaders projected the Pakistani atomic bomb as the Islamic bomb to Saudi Arabia, Libya and Iran, they emphasised the following:5. In pursuance of this agreement, teams of nuclear scientists of Saudi Arabia , Libya and Iran had been regularly visiting Pakistan since the 1980s for being trained in its nuclear establishments and for an exchange of views with Pakistani scientists. Dr.A. Q.Khan, the so-called father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, had been regularly visiting these countries to assist them. Pakistan also agreed to help Libya and Iran in setting up an uranium enrichment plant based on the model of its own enrichment facility at Kahuta, which was based on a model from Holland on the basis of drawings stolen by A.Q.Khan, who was working there.
- Pakistan would hold the bomb in its custody on behalf of the Islamic Ummah as a whole.
- The bomb would be available for use, if need be, not only against India, but also against Israel.
- If any of the funding countries (Saudi Arabia, Libya and Iran) felt the need for developing their own independent nuclear capability to protect themselves against Israel, Pakistan would be happy to assist them by training their scientists in Pakistani nuclear establishments, by sharing its technology and experience with them and by placing at their disposal its clandestine nuclear procurement network.
6. Was Pakistan's assistance to Iran and Libya confined to the setting-up of an uranium enrichment facility or did it go beyond to helping them to militarise their capability? Pakistan's own atomic bomb was based on a Chinese model with the help of drawings clandestinely given by China to Islamabad to counter India's perceived nuclear capability. Reliable sources in Pakistan have reported that when Pakistan carried out its nuclear tests at Chagai in May,1998, nuclear scientists from Saudi Arabia and North Korea were present and that one of the devices tested was of North Korean origin. Past reports had spoken of the presence of only North Korean scientists at Chagai, but recent reports speak of the presence of Saudi scientists too in their capacity as the major financiers of the project. They also say that Pakistan shared the Chinese drawings definitely with Iran and Libya.
7. What is the position regarding Saudi Arabia? Was it also interested in developing its own uranium enrichment capability and was Pakistan helping it too? On the basis of the evidence presently available, I do not think so. To my knowledge, Saudi Arabia does not have an ambitious civilian nuclear power programme and would, therefore, find it even more difficult than Iran to justify its need for an uranium enrichment capability.
8. However, Saudi Arabia, which takes seriously Pakistan's projection of its atomic bomb as an Islamic bomb and which is a major financier of the entire Pakistani project, enjoys a privileged position in the Pakistani nuclear establishment, the like of which neither Libya nor Iran had before the unearthing of Pakistan's nuclear nexus with these countries by the USA-UK post 9/11. That privileged position is demonstrated by the fact that the Saudi Ambassador in Islamabad or a senior and trusted representative of the Saudi regime sits in secret meetings of the Pakistani military and nuclear establishments to discuss Pakistan's programme and that whenever he comes to Pakistan, Crown Prince Abdullah makes unpublicised visits to the uranium enrichment plant at Kahuta and other nuclear establishments and he used to be briefed by Dr.A.Q.Khan and other senior scientists on various aspects of the Pakistani programme.
9. There are certain questions, which have remained unanswered. The Saudi monarchy has always strongly distrusted Libya and Iran, Was it aware of the details of the Pakistani assistance to them and, if so, why it did not try to put its foot down and stop it? Was it because of its confidence that Libya and Iran would use their military nuclear capability only against Israel and not against any Islamic country?
10. While Pakistan's nuclear assistance to Saudi Arabia, Libya and Iran arose out of considerations of Islamic solidarity and religious obligation to help a brother Islamic country, its assistance to North Korea was motivated purely by the need to get from North Korea as a quid pro quo medium and long-range missiles and the technology for producing them. China gave Pakistan short-range, nuclear-capable missiles and possibly medium-range ones too and the technology for producing them, but was disinclined to give it long-range ones. Only North Korea was prepared to give them, in return partly for much-needed cash and wheat and partly for Pakistani assistance in developing its military nuclear capability. The Pakistan-North Korea nuclear axis is a purely opportunistic alliance.
11. Was there any other non-Islamic countries with which Pakistan has had clandestine nuclear contacts in the past? Yes. Brazil and South Korea. Both were interested in the Kahuta design and technology. There is, however, no evidence of these contacts having resulted in any agreement on actual assistance.
12. Is it not stupid on the part of Pakistan to have clandestine nuclear contacts with adversaries such as North and South Korea or Saudi Arabia and Iran? What we see as stupidity, the Pakistani rulers see it as opportunistic cunning to serve their national interests. Such duplicity and double-dealing in the pursuit of foreign policy has been a constant in Pakistan's history since it was born in 1947. It co-operates with the USA in the monitoring of the activities of terrorists from alleged sanctuaries in the Iranian territory. At the same time, it shares with Iran intelligence regarding the US presence and activities in Afghanistan.
13. What is the possibility of Pakistan or individual Pakistani scientists helping Al Qaeda and the International Islamic Front (IIF) in acquiring a military nuclear capability? As I have been repeatedly pointing out since 9/11, the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET), which is a member of the IIF and now plays a leadership role in it, has followers in Pakistan's nuclear scientists' community. Past reports on the annual conventions of the LET at its headquarters at Muridke in Pakistani Punjab had spoken of the presence of unidentified Pakistani nuclear scientists at these conventions. There has been a penetration of Pakistan's nuclear scientists' community not only by the LET, but also by the Hizbut Tehrir (HT). There is a growing community of jihadi nuclear scientists in Pakistan. Retired scientists Sultan Bashiruddin Chaudhry and Abdul Majid, who were found having contacts with Osama bin Laden in the name of an ostensibly humanitarian relief non-governmental organisation, constitute only the tip of the jihadi iceberg in Pakistan's nuclear establishment. The danger of the likelihood of transfer of nuclear technology and material to Al Qaeda and the IIF from them is real.
1 4. The world seems to have forgotten that the Western intelligence agencies had discovered between 1985 and 1988 a clandestine Pakistani network for the procurement of nuclear waste from the nuclear establishments of the then West Germany and other European countries. This was in addition to the clandestine network which A.Q.Khan was operating for the procurement of uranium enrichment technology and machinery. Why was it interested in the procurement of nuclear waste? To try to use it in a radiological device (dirty bomb ) against India, if the need arose.
15. The Americans claim to have an accurate knowledge of the details of the production and storage in Pakistan's nuclear establishment. But, what happened to the large quantity of nuclear waste procured by A.Q.Khan & co in the 1980s? Nobody knows. Don't be surprised if these stocks are already with Al Qaeda and waiting to be used.
16. Pakistan's nuclear promiscuity is not a one night stand. It is a long continuing affair. A.Q. Khan and the half a dozen scientists ostensibly arrested and interrogated by President Pervez Musharraf earlier this year were not the only participants in this. Every Pakistani General since Zia, including Gen. Musharraf, had actively participated. If you want to establish the complete picture, A.Q.Khan and other scientists involved have to be taken out of Pakistan and interrogated by a joint team of international experts. Unless and until this is done, the Damocle's sword of nuclear terrorism will continue to hang over our head.
( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Distinguished Fellow and Convenor, Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Chennai Chapter. E-mail: corde@vsnl.com )
Home | Papers | Notes | Forum | Search | Feedback | Links
Copyright © South Asia Analysis Group
All rights reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the author's name are acknowledged. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes.