South Asia Analysis Group  
Papers  


 

Paper no.164

  

home.jpg (6376 bytes)

 

 

DAWN IN J & K?

by B.Raman

 
A lesson from Vietnam and Afghanistan was the inadvisability of assessing ground situations largely on the basis of a statistical analysis of encounter and body counts.

There are intangibles--not quantifiable--- which are equally, if not more important, such as perceptions, feelings, morale, motivation and other indicators of the state of mind.

A purely statistical analysis of the post-Kargil ground situation in Jammu & Kashmir could depict a misleadingly pessimistic picture and fail to focus on the first signs of an evolution in the state of mind of the population. The features of this evolution are:

*  The Pakistani propaganda about the inevitability of a battle fatigue in the Indian security forces is no longer accepted by the people. The morale of the Armed forces is as high as ever and there has been an improvement in Police morale. There has been an increase in intelligence flow due to greater interactions between the Police and concerned sections of the population.

*  There is growing concern in the population over what they describe as Pakistan's Afghanisation of the situation, marked by a plethora of mercenary groups with no commonly shared political objectives and with their religious/sectarian agenda assuming primacy over the political agenda of the indigenous groups.

*  There are incipient signs of a militancy and violence fatigue in the population. Afghanistan has already passed through two decades of darkness and death, with no light at the end of the tunnel. The awesome prospects of a similar scenario in Kashmir, if Pakistan and the mercenary groups have their way are causing increasing concern.

* There is a realisation that the international community, already concerned over the mess in Afghanistan, is not prepared to countenance Pakistan's agenda, which could create a similar mess in J & K.

This evolution has led to serious re-thinking in the indigenous groups, resulting in a desire for giving primacy to a search for a political solution in preference to the militancy, which is proving counter-productive for the ordinary people.

In this context, one cannot fault the initiative of the Govt. of India for a cease-fire during the holy fasting period of Ramdan in the hope that the Government's gesture would find an echo from the indigenous militant groups as well as from the Pakistani military regime, in the form of a decline in violence and terrorism and Pakistani instigation of it.

Similar hopes in July-August during the short-lived cease-fire announced by the Jammat-e-Islami (JEI) controlled Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) were belied due to the following reasons:

* Gen. Pervez Musharraf, the self-styled Chief Executive of Pakistan, who initially cleared the HM's cease-fire offer, subsequently succumbed to pressure from the religious forces and fundamentalist Army officers led by Lt.Gen. Mohammed Aziz, the then Chief of the General Staff (CGS), and asked the HM to wriggle out of its offer.

* Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the Amir of the JEI, who reportedly gave signs of moderation during his meetings with the US State Department officials in Washington, reverted to his extremist line on his return to Pakistan under pressure from the pro-Wahabi groups such as the Markaz Dawa Al-Irshad and its militant wing called the Lashkar-e-Toiba, the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HUM) and the Al Badar.

It is believed that the US, which is keen to break the logjam, has been working through various channels:

* Through intermediaries reputedly close to Gen.Musharraf, whose advice he values, in order to make him more assertive in preventing a negative outcome of the Govt. of India's gesture.

* Through sustained interactions with the JEI. There is reportedly a realisation in the State Department that the past policy of avoiding interactions with the religious extremist forces in Pakistan and with the Taliban has not been helpful in the US' counter-terrorism efforts. While the US diplomatic missions in Pakistan have, even in the past, been interacting with prominent personalities of the JEI and the Jamaat-ul-Ulema Pakistan of Maulana Fazlur Rahman in Pakistani territory, State Department officials in Washington were not easily accessible to personalities of these organisations visiting the US. The visit of the Qazi to the State Department was reportedly the first since the 1980s by a religious-political leader from Pakistan. The US has also intensified interactions with the Taliban in Pakistani territory and in New York where the Taliban has an office. However, it continues to avoid active interactions with the pro-Wahabi organisations.

Would these parallel efforts of New Delhi and Washington lead to a positive outcome of New Delhi's gesture and prevent Islamabad from coming in the way of a dialogue between the indigenous militants and the Govt. of India?

The indicators so far are not yet definitive one way or the other. The reactions from J & K have been encouraging, but from Pakistan have been halting and ambivalent. Gen. Musharraf's first year in office clearly brought out his inability to resist pressure from the Islamic extremist forces and the fundamenmtalist group in the Army on various issues--domestic as well as external concerning India, the US and the Taliban.

After the HM's ceasefire retreat under pressure from these elements, he shifted Lt.Gen.Aziz from the GHQ to Lahore and in the recent reshuffle in the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) he has superceded officers known for their proximity to Lt.Gen.Aziz, resulting in their exit.

These moves have not been resisted by these fundamentalist Army officers, who continue to give signs of solidarity with Gen. Musharraf. This should not, however, be misread to mean that his position has now been strengthened and that he could, therefore, be more assertive in relation to the J & K issue now than he was in July-August and break out of his past rigidities and strike out a new conciliatory path.

One has to keep one's fingers crossed.


(1-12-00)

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-Mail: corde@vsnl.com )