Use of Soft
Power in Counter-Terrorism -International Terrorism
Monitor--Paper
No. 306
By B. Raman
Anger is a common root cause
of all terrorism---ideological, ethnic, separatist,
sectarian or religious. Terrorist organisations exploit the
anger to motivate the members of the community from which
they have arisen to support them in their acts of
terrorism. Such support can be in the form of volunteers
for committing acts of terrorism, contribution of funds,
logistic support etc. Extreme anger in individuals can
motivate them to resort to terrorism as individuals without
their belonging to any organisation. Anger containment and
ultimate reduction has, therefore, to be an important
component of counter-terrorism.
2.Terrorists use the soft
power of the media----old and new--- to keep the anger
sustained and make it increase in order to maintain a high
level of motivation. The role of soft power in
counter-terrorism is to neutralise the motivation through
anger containment and reduction. Use of disinformation is
counter-productive in counter-terrorism. For effective use of
soft power in counter-terrorism, the causes of anger have to
be identified and those, which are capable of being removed,
have to be removed. Counter-terrorism itself often adds to
the prevailing anger through disproportionate use of force,
serious violation of human rights etc. These are tactical
causes of anger and can be easily removed through
corrections in the counter-terrorism techniques.
3. It is more
difficult---often impossible--- to remove strategic causes
of anger. As examples of such strategic causes, one could
mention Al Qaeda's anger over historic wrongs allegedly
committed to the Muslims. The objective of the soft power
has to be to explain to the community supporting terrorism
the untenability of such causes and wean the community away
from terrorism---whether by organisations or by individuals.
A mix of removal of tactical causes of anger through
appropriate correctives in counter-terrorism operations and
explanation of the untenability of the strategic causes is
required if the use of soft power is to be effective.
4.An attribute of soft
power---whether in a conventional war with State
adversaries or in an unconventional conflict with non-State
actors--- is the ability to convey a message to a targeted
audience in a convincing manner through an appropriate
instrument of dissemination suited to the targeted audience.
5.All media----the print
media,radio, TV, audio and video cassettes, films and the
Internet--- are weapons of soft power. The handheld gun and
the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are weapons of hard
power. Just as weapons of hard power keep improving with the
advent of new technologies, so too the weapons of soft
power. The advent of the Direct-to-Home (DTH) TV and the
Internet totally revolutionised the way soft power is
wielded by making it possible to take a message to the
targeted people in their living rooms over the heads of
their rulers and censors.
6. All States use soft
power---not only against State adversaries, but also against
sections of their own people who take to insurgency or
terrorism. Similarly, non-State actors----particularly the
jihadi terrorist organisations--- too use soft power in
their campaign against their state adversaries.
7. One has been seeing since
9/11 that jihadi terrorist organisations----particularly Al
Qaeda and its associates--- have become more adept in their
use of soft power against their State adversaries than their
State adversaries in their use against the terrorists. This
is one of the factors, which has contributed to the
continued resilience of Al Qaeda and its associates and their
ability to draw volunteers and support from the communities
from which they have arisen.
8. The inability of the
US-led coalition to use soft power effectively against the
jihadi terrorists comes in the way of the campaign against
terrorism making headway. The Western powers have had a long
history of the effective use of soft power against
adversaries. One would be aware of the role played by the
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) during the Second
World War against the Nazis and the Fascists. The broadcasts
of the BBC helped in two ways. They kept up the morale of
the British people and rallied them to supporting the cause
of the war. They weakened the credibility of the Nazis and
the Fascists in the eyes of their own people.
9. Similarly, one would be
aware of the role played by the use of soft power by the US
during the Cold War against the USSR and other Communist
States in undermining their credibility and bringing about
their collapse. Among the instruments of soft power used by
the US for this purpose were the Voice of America, funded by
the State Department, and the Munich-based Radio Free
Europe and Radio Liberty, allegedly funded by the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the publication and
dissemination of books written by political dissidents from
the Communist countries explaining why they ran away from
their country. The Clinton Administration set up a Radio
Free Asia to promote the cause of democracy in Asia.
10.One of the reasons the US
was able to use its soft power effectively during the Cold
War was the availability of a large reservoir of political
dissidents from the Communist countries, who co-operated in
the running of the radio stations and imparted credibility
to their broadcasts.
11 Al Qaeda and its
associates have shown some sophistication in their use of
soft power against the US and its allies. The effectiveness
of soft power depends on the contents of the message sought
to be disseminated and the instruments chosen for their
dissemination. The selection of the instruments depends on
the audience to which the message is directed. Any research
with regard to the instrument and the contents of the
message to be used has to start with a research on the
intended audience.
12. Any strategy for the use
of soft power against Al Qaeda and its associates has to
provide for two totally different kinds of audience. The
first audience is the people in the spawning areas of jihadi
terrorism. These are the tribal areas on both sides of the
Pakistan-Afghanistan border. They are semi-literate, if not
illiterate. They are highly Talibanised. They look upon
visuals as evils and anti-Islam. They destroy TV sets, CDs,
Video cassettes and computers. Hence, the use of the print
media, the TV and the Internet in their case may not work.
The only instrument of dissemination with which they feel
comfortable is the radio. Moreover, they are so poor that
radio is the only instrument which they can afford.
13. One finds the jihadi
terrorist organisations extensively using FM radio
broadcasts since 2002 to reach their messages to the tribal
people. FM radio broadcasts are used for preaching,
mobilisation, enlistment of volunteers, collection of funds,
motivation and aggravating their anger against the US. It is
reported that there are nearly 30 illegal FM radio stations
operating from the mosques and madrasas in the tribal areas
making anti-Musharraf and anti-US broadcasts.
14. The arguments used by
these broadcasts are of a tactical nature such as calls for
reprisals against the Pakistan army's raid into the Lal
Masjid of Islamabad in July, 2007, against Musharraf for
co-operating with the US and against the US for allegedly
bombing mosques and madrasas and using the Air Force against
the civilian population. Their arguments have no strategic
content such as their vision of the Ummah of tomorrow.
15. The broadcasts of these
radio stations have been effective till now because the
US-led coalition has not thought of an effective counter.
Jamming them cannot be the counter. Moreover, one can jam
some broadcasts for some time, but not all broadcasts for
all time. Hence, a more intelligent counter would have been
for the US-led coalition to have its own broadcasting
capability manned by Muslims speaking the language and
dialects of the area, well-versed in Islam and in the ethnic
and cultural mores of the area, who can gradually wean the
population away from the terrorists. Such a broadcast
strategy is nowhere to be seen or felt. It is time for the
soft power experts of the US to think in terms of a Radio
Free Islam or just Radio Islam and Radio Harmony, if they
have not already done so, in order to make an impact on the
tribals.
16. The second audience is
the diaspora of Muslims across the Western world. The
defining characteristics of this audience totally differ
from those of the tribal audience in the spawning grounds of
jihadi terrorism. They are educated, radicalised, but not
Talibanised, and they are capable of tactical as well as
strategic thinking. Issues relating to maintaining the
pristine purity of Islam do not agitate them to the same
extent as issues relating to Palestine, Israel, Afghanistan,
Iraq and the war on terror as waged by the US.
17. While the second
audience feels comfortable with all instruments of
dissemination, it avoids the Western print media which it
looks upon as controlled by Jewish money and interests. It
will not be possible for it to own and operate radio and TV
stations from the Western countries. It, therefore, relies
almost exclusively on the Internet for its jihadi mission.
Al Qaeda and its associates too use the Internet for
rallying radical elements of the diaspora to their cause.
15.Internet activism is the
most important component of Al Qaeda's use of soft power to
win adherents to its cause from the diaspora. The Internet
provides a variety of ways of reaching and influencing the
targeted audience----the conventional E-mail and web sites,
the chat rooms, the blogs etc. Many papers have come out on
the use of the Internet by Al Qaeda and pro-Al Qaeda jihadi
terrorist organisations and angry Muslim individuals for
operational purposes, meaning, commission of acts of
terrorism. There is an equally urgent need for a study of
the use of the Internet by the terrorists as an instrument
of soft power to mould opinion in the Islamic world in their
favour and against their state adversaries.
16. They use the Internet
with some effectiveness for keeping the anger in the Islamic
world sustained, if not enhanced, and for motivating Muslims
to join the global jihad in their own way and according to
their own lights. They do not ask them to join any
particular organisation. They merely ask them to rise
against the enemy and martyr themselves for what they
project as the cause of the Muslims. Many do by joining
different organisations and some in their individual
capacity without joining any organisation.
17. The focus of counter-terrorism
experts till now has been on countering the operational use
of the Internet by the terrorists for acts of terrorism. Not
adequate thought has been given to countering the use of the
Internet as an instrument of soft power. How States can use
the Internet to demotivate the terrorists or potential
terrorists? What role the Internet can play in making the
civil society think about the damage being caused by the
terrorists? Just as the terrorists seek to cause and enhance
anger, counter-terrorism agencies should cause and enhance
disgust against the terrorists, by making effective use of
truth about the real nature of terrorism instead of
indulging in disinformation and spins. One can use
disinformation and spins against adversary States but not
against non-State actors, which often consist of one's own
people.
18. Right from the days of
the Vietnam War, one has been talking of the silent
majority, which is not able or willing to assert itself.
There is an equally strong silent majority in all civil
societies, which feels disturbed by the phenomenon of jihadi
terrorism----which does not spare even fellow-Muslims. This
silent majority is not prepared to activate itself through
conventional means such as holding processions, writing
articles in the print media, addressing audiences etc It is
afraid of being targeted by the terrorists and killed.
19. The Internet provides an
excellent means of empowering this inarticulate majority and
encouraging it to come out against religious radicalism and
the resort to terror, without fearing the consequences of
their Internet activism. How to promote Internet activism by
enlightened sections of the Muslim civil societies and
communities against radicalism and terrorism is a subject,
which needs attention from policy-makers and civil society
leaders.
20.Mr.Gordon Brown, the
British Prime Minister, told the House of Commons on
November 14,2007, that " Britain will spend 400 million
pounds abroad on fighting radicalisation. the first time,
Britain would sponsor events in Pakistan to counter
extremist propaganda."
He did not elaborate how this money will be spent and what
events will be sponsored. A better way would be to make
effective use of the available instruments of soft power in
more imaginative ways. The extent of the funding is only
one aspect of action. Bringing to bear an imaginative
approach to the problem is an equally important aspect---if
not more important. Six years after 9/11, one does not find
much evidence of such thinking and such an imaginative
approach despite a profusion in funding.
21. In the years after the
Second World War, Mr. Northcote Parkinson told the British
policy-makers who assessed the effectiveness of their
actions in terms of the money spent:" When funds are
limitless, the only economy made is in thinking." We can
update this and say in the context of today's so-called war
on terrorism: "When funds are limitless, a battlefield
casualty is your imagination."
22. What one needs is not
just more funds, but more imagination and innovation.
(The
writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat,
Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director,
Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)