China: Dalai Lama accused of “selling out”
Chinese territory with intention to sow
discord in Sino-Indian relations
By D. S. Rajan
Reacting to Indian press
reports (4 June 2008) about the statement
made for the first time by the Dalai Lama
that the “McMahon line”, fixed by the 1914
Simla Convention is legal and accordingly, “
Arunachal Pradesh” including Tawang, is a
part of India, a report in the People’s
Daily- affiliated Global Times (Chinese
language, 10 June 2008), recalled that the
Indian Government ‘forcibly occupied’ the
Chinese territory south of “McMahon line” in
1951 and formed “Arunachal Pradesh” in 1987.
According to the Chinese paper, the Indian
despatches contrasted the present statement
with the evasive reply given by the exiled
leader on the subject earlier in 2003 during
his visit to Tawang, saying merely that
“Arunachal Pradesh” is a de facto part of
Tibet, along with the remark that what the
spiritual leader has said now, can certainly
influence the Sino-Indian border talks.
Global Times quoted an
authoritative India specialist associated
with the Institute for Asia-Pacific Studies
of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
Professor Sun Shihai, as saying to the
paper’s correspondent that the change in the
attitude of “Dalai” on “Arunachal Pradesh”
reflects the fact that the “Tibet
Independence” forces are facing bad days
more and more, in the background of
improving Sino-Indian relations. The change
has more or less brought out the “worries”
on the part of such forces, as China and
India get closer. The Olympic torch could
pass through India and New Delhi arrested
the ‘head of the Tibet independence
organisation’. No activity of “Tibet
Independence” forces can influence the
overall situation in Sino-Indian relations.
The Chinese scholar asserted that on
Sino-Indian border talks, the “Dalai” cannot
represent anybody and that the change in his
attitude, will not affect that talks.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao has described the
Tibet issue as a ‘sensitive’ one in Sino-
Indian ties. Beijing reportedly took up the
issue of the Dalai Lama’s ‘free use’ of the
Indian media, when India’s Minister for
External Affairs visited China recently. Now
comes the Chinese allegation, perhaps for
the first time in recent years, on the
exiled leader’s ‘sowing discord’ in
Beijing-New Delhi relations. Beijing’s
motives are not difficult to see – it
intends to apply more and more pressure on
the Dalai Lama to accept Central
Government’s conditions for dialogue as well
as give a subtle warning to New Delhi about
the risks for bilateral relations coming
from any encouragement under the pretext of
democracy, to what it feels, the
‘anti-China’ activities of the Dalai Lama
and his followers in India. Secondly,
Beijing seems to be trying to kill two birds
with one stone- using the attack on the
Dalai Lama to drive a wedge between him and
the Indian Government as well as to
reinforce its claim on Arunachal Pradesh.
Interestingly, the latter is being carried
out through an unending publicity drive and
it is happening at a time when New Delhi is
taking care to use every occasion to satisfy
China by declaring that the Tibet Autonomous
Region is an integral part of China.
Obviously, China, for its own reasons, does
not feel any necessity to maintain restraint
in reciprocation to such attitude of India.
The recent Tibet unrest
is widely being seen outside China as a
factor, which could contribute to erosion of
China’s bargaining position in the border
talks with India. Adding strength to such
views, are the Dalai Lama’s latest
observations on Arunachal, which may find
acceptance of the Tibetan population inside
China. Contrary to what China is telling, it
should therefore be Beijing, which should
“worry” about what the Dalai Lama has said.
(The writer, D. S. Rajan, is Director of the
Chennai Centre for China Studies, Chennai,
India,
Email:dsrajan@gmail.com)