JIHADIS HOLD INDIA TO RANSOM-INTERNATIONAL
TERRORISM MONITOR--PAPER NO. 446
By B. Raman
1. The events in New Delhi since the terrorist strike by the
so-called Indian Mujahideen (IM) on September 13 2008, which
killed 26 innocent civilians, should be a matter of concern
for all right-thinking Indians.
2. The
pent-up anger of large sections of our society over the
helplessness and ineptitude of Shivraj Patil, the Home
Minister of the Government of India, who occupies a position
similar to that of the British Home Secretary and the
Secretary for Homeland Security in the US, burst out with
many demands either for his resignation from the Cabinet of
Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh or for his dismissal if he
refused to resign.
3. Neither
happened. Patil brazenly said: "There is no question of my
resigning so long as I retain the confidence of my leader."
Whom did he mean by "my leader"? Dr. Manmohan Singh? No.
Sonia Gandhi. He himself said so. What he said amounted to
his asserting that so long as Sonia Gandhi had confidence in
him, he did not have to worry about Manmohan Singh, who
cannot touch him, or about the hundreds of innocent
civilians, who have been killed by the jihadi terrorists in
recent months..
4. On
September 17, 2008, Dr. Manmohan Singh addressed the
conference of the Governors of the States of India at New
Delhi. His address reflected his concern over the widespread
perception right across India that his Government was soft
on terrorism and was unable to control it for want of
effective legal measures to empower the police to deal with
this cancer effectively . It also carried an admission that
in addition to the continuing threat of jihadi terrorism
sponsored by Pakistan, India was facing a new dimension to
the threat to national security due to a number of Indian
Muslims gravitating to the ranks of the jihadis .
5. His
address was widely welcomed as indicating that he and his
Government were at long last coming out of the denial mode
into which they had kept themselves confined since they came
to office in 2004 and were now prepared for action to
empower the police against the jihadi terrorists and to
counter effectively the activities of the home-grown jihadis,
but the hopes were belied within 24 hours. The Prime
Minister was apparently over-ruled by sections of his own
colleagues in the Cabinet and in his Congress (I) party and
by the other parties, which are part of the ruling
coalition.
6. Briefing
the media after a special Cabinet meeting to discuss
counter-terrorism on September 18, Priyaranjan Dasmunshi,
Minister for Information and Broadcasting in the Cabinet of
Manmohan Singh, virtually debunked and nullified what his
own Prime Minister had told the Governors the previous day.
He said that there was no need for special powers for the
Police to deal with jihadi terrorism. " If the present laws
are implemented properly, there is no need for additional
laws, " he said as reported by "The Hindu" of September
19, 2008.
7. Thus,
twice within five days of the New Delhi blasts, two senior
Ministers of his Cabinet had sought to give an impression as
if the Prime Minister's views on counter-terrorism did not
count. His authority in matters relating to
counter-terrorism against jihadi terrorists has been sought
to be marginalised by members of his own Cabinet and party
as well as by members of the ruling coalition.
8. Some
weeks ago, when there was a similar attempt to weaken the
authority of the Prime Minister in matters relating to
India's close relations with the US and the concretisation
of the agreement with the US for civil nuclear co-operation,
the Prime Minister reportedly threatened to resign in
protest. This led to his party supporting him in this
matter. One would have expected the Prime Minister to
similarly threaten to quit if his authority in matters
relating to counter-terrorism is not respected and upheld by
his colleagues in the Government and party. He has chosen
not to do so even though the subject of protecting the lives
and property of the citizens of this country is a much more
important issue than the question of the nuclear agreement
with the US.
9. Dasmunshi
did not stop with debunking his own Prime Minister and
others who spoke of the need for additional laws to deal
with jihadi terrorism. He even ridiculed the concerns of the
public over the recurring jihadi terrorist strikes across
the country. The same issue of "The Hindu" has quoted him as
saying : "Can anyone predict a terrorist strike? No
Government can prevent it." So, to go by his words, the
innocent civilians of this country have no other option but
to keep dying at the hands of the jihadi terrorists.
10.The
events of the past few days have further indicated----if
further indication was necessary--- as to who lays down the
counter-terrorism policy of this country against jihadi
terrorism.
Sonia Gandhi? No.
The Prime Minister of India? No.
The Home Minister of India? No.
The intelligence chiefs? No.
The police chiefs? No.
11. It is
laid down by the leaders of the Muslim community themselves.
They indicate the dos and don'ts and the Government does not
have the courage to go against them. There is a systematic
attempt by the leaders of the Muslim community to ridicule
the results of the police investigation into the activities
of the IM. The police are accused of fabricating evidence
and of targeting innocent Muslim youth in order to discredit
Islam and the Muslim community. Everytime a suspected jihadi
terrorist is sought to be arrested by the police, these
leaders and the members of the community rally to his
support. They either try to prevent him from being arrested
or if the police manage to arrest, to frustrate his
interrogation by making allegations of targeting the Muslim
community in order to discredit it.
12. In
recent months, the Tamil Nadu police have arrested dozens of
Tamil citizens of India on suspicion of their links with the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Do the Tamils
allege that their community is being targeted? No. Many Nagas
used to be arrested in Nagaland because of their alleged
links with Naga insurgent organisations? Did the Naga
leaders allege that their community was being targeted? No.
Many Hindus in Assam are arrested on suspicion of their
links with the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA). Do
the leaders of the local Hindu community allege that the
Hindus are being targeted? No.
13. But the
moment the Police arrests a Muslim for any reason-----for
being a mafia leader, a narcotics smuggler, a counterfeiter
or a jihadi terrorist--- large sections of the Muslim
community rise in his or her defence and try to discredit
the police by accusing it of targeting the community by
fabricating evidence. No leader of the Congress (I) or other
parties of the ruling coalition has the courage to tell the
Muslim leaders that the law has to take its own course
against any wrong-doer whatever be his or her religion or
ethnicity or language and that the police should do whatever
they have to in order to protect the lives and property of
the citizens of this country. The leaders of the Muslim
community are seeking to create an impression that a Muslim
can do no wrong and that all the wrongs are committed by
non-Muslims.
14. The
comprehensive UN Security Council Resolution No.1373 passed
unanimously after the 9/11 terrorist strikes in the US,
inter alia, called upon the member-countries of the UN to
take necessary legal measures to further empower the police.
India is one of the few countries in the world not to have
implemented the resolution in toto due to fear of adverse
reactions from its Muslim community. The Azamgarh District
of Uttar Pradesh is not located in a remote area of the
country where the Police cannot reach. It is in the heart of
India. It was previously the Sicily of India from which many
of the Muslim mafia leaders, narcotics smugglers and other
criminals emerged. It is now becoming the breeding ground of
India's home-grown jihadi terrorism. Many of those arrested
in connection with the investigations into the activities of
the IM have had an Azamgarh connection. Azamgarh is slowly
emerging as India's South Waziristan, a new radiating point
of jihadi terrorism. The police is not given a free hand to
put an end to this spawning ground. The predominantly Muslim
areas of this district are becoming no-go areas for the
police----not because the Police do not have the capability
to neutralise the emerging jihadi breeding grounds, but
because the political leadership will not allow them to use
that capability for fear of displeasing the Muslims.
15.Pleasing
the Muslims at any price----by closing our eyes to the
depredations of the jihadi terrorists in our midst--- in
order to retain their support during the election has become
an important driving force of the electoral strategy of the
ruling coalition. If hundreds of innocent civilians have to
die as a result, so be it. Keeping the Muslims happy is more
important than protecting the lives and property of the
citizens of this country.
16. Another
disturbing trend has not received the attention it deserved.
Many members of the Cabinet of Manmohan Singh and many
leaders of the ruling coalition are reportedly unhappy with
the intelligence agencies and the Police for speaking of
home-grown jihadi terrorism. They are also reportedly
unhappy with the Prime Minister himself for drawing
attention to this in his address to the Governors'
conference. They want that the focus should continue to be
on Pakistan and the terrorists sponsored by Pakistan and
that one should not highlight the role of the Indian Muslims
in the global jihad. They are worried that the talk of
home-grown jihadi terrorism might increase pressure on the
Government to step up the monitoring of developments in the
Indian Muslim community and identify and neutralise the
Indian Muslims taking to jihadi terrorism.
17. On
September 19,2008, Mohan Chand Sharma, a legendary and brave
Inspector of the Delhi Police, succumbed to bullet injuries
after he was shot thrice by a group of jihadi terrorists
from Azamgarh, who were operating from a hide-out in a
Muslim area in the heart of New Delhi. Sharma, with a small
team of his officers, had gone to the hide-out to arrest a
group of five jihadi terrorists, believed responsible for
the recent serial blasts. The cynical reaction of the
so-called secular class as a whole to this despicable action
of the jihadis has shocked the country. The so-called
secular political class has vied with one another in
praising this brave officer and in announcing financial
assistance for the members of his family. But, not one of
them has condemned the Indian jihadis for their despicable
crime and called for action to root out jihadi terrorism in
our midst.
18.
Fortunately, we are a democratic country. If the Muslims,
who constitute only about 15 per cent of the population of
the country, have the power of the vote, the rest of the
population has it too. The Hindus constitute about 80 per
cent of the population. At the time of voting, every voter
should have before his or her eyes the pictures of the death
and destruction being caused right across the country by the
jihadis and the faces of Sharma and other similar brave
officers of the security forces, who have sacrificed their
lives in the fight against jihadi terrorists despite the
lack of support from the so-called secular political class.
19. Every
vote in the forthcoming elections should be a vote against
jihadi terrorism and against the political leaders who are
not prepared to act against the jihadi terrorists. Let there
be an anti-jihadi tsunami against all of them.
20. Thus far
and no further----that is the message that should go across
to the jihadi terrorists and their political backers and
secular apologists.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and,
presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai.
E0-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)