PAKISTAN’S TALIBANIZATION:
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR CHINA AND OPTIONS
By Dr. Subhash kapila
Introductory
Observations
Pakistan’s impending
take-over by the Taliban as evidenced by
their recent advances to the doorstops of
the capital city of Islamabad by armed
occupation of Swat and Buner, has raised
strategic concerns and fears in the United
States and NATO countries.
The developing
situation in Pakistan portending a collapse
of state sovereignty in Pakistan under the
Taliban onslaught and the reluctance of the
Pakistan Army to commit its regular army
formations to stem the Taliban tide has
forced the United States to issue a blunt
warning to Pakistan that it would have to
militarily intervene in Swat to evict the
Taliban.
The United States has
legitimate fears on the enveloping Taliban
menace in that even in their present
configuration of wresting control of Swat,
Buner and contesting in Haripur, the Taliban
are sitting over- looking two strategic
Pakistani military installations of the
Heavy Mechanical Complex at Wah and the
Pakistan Air Force Base at Minhas, Wah is
the chief and central strategic site for
materials ad components of Pakistan's
nuclear weapons and the Pakistan Air Base at
Minhas is the launch pad for Pakistan Air
Force nuclear weapons armed combat
aircraft.
Taliban’s impending
drive to take over Islamabad has not only
become a United States and regional concern,
but has assumed global strategic concerns.
In such a disturbing
strategic scenario that is emerging in
Pakistan, what is strikingly noticeable is
that China is strangely silent and has not
voiced any strategic concerns, publicly at
least.
Some reports suggest
that China had expressed its concerns during
President Zardari’s visit to China and
recently to other Pakistani dignitaries too.
But that was before the present looming
Taliban crisis threatening Islamabad
emerged.
Reports also suggest
that while China has been publicly espousing
the internationalizing of the Afghanistan
problem, to which the present Taliban crisis
is intricately interlinked, yet behind the
scenes it has assured the United States that
it is comfortable with United States
military presence in Afghanistan, which
incidentally bears heavily on Pakistan.
Admittedly, China has
cultivated back-door linkages with the
Taliban and other Jihadi groups for
geo-political reasons but when strategically
analyzed it can be said that these linkages
cannot diminish or lessen the strategic
implications for China of Pakistan emerging
under full or partial control of the
Taliban.
This Paper attempts to
analyze the strategic implications for China
of the above eventuality under the following
heads:
-
China’s Strategic
Stakes in Pakistan Outweigh Those of the
United States.
-
Pakistan’s
Talibanizaton: A Severe Strategic
Set-Back for China.
-
China’s Strategic
Options in Eventuality of Taliban
Take-Over of Pakistan.
China’s Strategic
Stakes in Pakistan Outweigh Those of the
United States
This assertion is being
basically made to highlight the fact that if
the United States has become so
strategically concerned as to threaten US
military actions in Swat, then China with
far more vital geo-strategic and
geo-political stakes in Pakistan by virtue
of geographical contiguity, should be
seriously alarmed today.
At a higher strategic
plane, Pakistani’s strategic utility to
China by virtue of a 47-year old strategic
nexus between the two nations, arises from
the following: (1) Pakistani’s strategic
dalliance with the United States has been
promiscuous, Pakistan is ever-ready to be
used by China as a counter-pressure point
against the United States (2) Pakistan can
geographically interrupt any American
containment strategies against China (3)
Pakistan has assiduously acted as the
“spoiler state” on China’s behalf against
India to keep India strategically confined
to South Asia (4) Geo-strategically,
Pakistan has given strategic access to China
to the North Arabian Sea, facilitated
China’s naval presence in proximity of the
Gulf through the Gwadur naval base and would
facilitate Chinese energy security by
permitting China to use Pakistan territory
as ‘energy corridors’ to China by rail, road
and pipeline links in the offing.
In recognition of
Pakistan’s proven strategic utility to
China, Pakistan has been bestowed with
a China facilitated nuclear weapons arsenal
and long range nuclear armed ballistic
missiles arsenal. In fact China bestowed a
strategic largesse on Pakistan which has
endowed Pakistan with strategic leverages
far above its true strategic potential.
China has also gifted
to Pakistan its so called civilian nuclear
reactors for energy purposes but which
essentially are the backbone of Pakistan's
nuclear weapons.
Geo-politically,
Pakistan has served as a political link for
China to the Islamic world and more
specifically to Saudi Arabia.
Militarily, the
military inventories of Pakistanis Armed
Forces are predominantly Chinese in origin
and unlike USA, China has never imposed arms
embargos on Pakistan. On the contrary,
during such US embargo periods, China
increased its military Supplies to Pakistan.
In terms of
under-writing Pakistanis security and
national integrity, China through a number
of strategic cooperation agreements has
committed itself to Pakistan. In fact,
Pakistan has for all these years has been
strategically defiant of even the United
States at times, entirely on the strength of
China’s assurances.
China would have
remained an East Asian Power basically, but
for its strategic nexus with Pakistan which
facilitated China an intrusive presence in
South Asia, Afghanistan and The Gulf
Region.
Comparitively, Pakistan
is only one of the strategic pieces for the
United States on the global strategic chess-
board, but for China it is the only “natural
ally” that China has in its ascendancy to
become a global power.
Pakistan’s
Talibanization: A Severe Strategic Setback
for China
Ordinarily, China
should not experience any severe strategic
setback in the event of the Taliban taking
over full control of Pakistan. China has
been adept in utilizing ‘rogue regimes’ like
North Korea and Pakistan’s military regimes
and converting them into ‘natural allies’
for its strategic advantages.
China could afford this
strategy as long as it stood on the
sidelines of the global power-play. Intent
on carving a respectable riche for itself
now in the global order, it is debatable as
to how far China could go strategically in
terms of supporting and subsidizing a
Taliban regime in Pakistan.
Further, Pakistan’s
strategic utility to China lay in the
centralized authoritarian control of
Pakistan by military regimes or
authoritarian civilian leaders likes
Zulfiqar Bhutto. China consistently and
strongly supported military regimes in
Pakistan.
Pakistan’s
Talibanization on the other hand could spell
strategic uncertainties for China’s
preference for centralized control of
Pakistan. In short, two disturbing scenarios
form the Chinese point of view can emerge in
a Talibanized Pakistan.
Pakistan’s
Talibanization could lead to a civil war in
Pakistan or fragmentation and disorder both
due to intra-Taliban rivalries and the
ethnic divide.
In both eventualities,
it would be a severe strategic setback for
China and the multiplicity of strategic
stakes that it embedded in Pakistan over the
decades.
China’s Strategic
Options in Eventuality of Taliban Take- Over
of Pakistan
China’s strategic
options in eventuality of Taliban take- over
of Pakistan basically boil down to the
following (1) Support and subsidize a
Taliban regime in Pakistan to safeguard its
strategic interests (2) Join the United
States and global mainstream to prevent a
Taliban take-over of Pakistan; and (3) Use
its tremendous leverages over the Pakistan
Army to effectively prevent Taliban
take-over of Pakistan.
The first option may be
tempting for China. However, it carries a
tremendous cost of global ostracizing of
China for subsiding terrorist regimes. It
would impair China’s attempt to cultivate an
image of being a ‘respectable Permanent
Member’ of the UN Security Council.
The second option is
not tempting for China as inherent in such a
global attempt would be a likely military
intervention in Pakistan by possibly a
US-led UN Coalition. China would not like to
permanently foreclose its strategic options
in Pakistan, and with the Pakistan Army in
particular.
The third option would
be a strategically “no cost, no loss” option
for China. It could use its significant
strategic leverages with the Pakistan Army
to impel it into a ruthless liquidation of
the Talibanization of Pakistan threat
currently underway. The Pakistan Army may
not be amenable to American strategic
pressures but it can ill-afford to ignore
China’s strategic preferences and pressures.
The Taliban not only
endanger China’s considerable strategic
stakes in Pakistan but also endanger China’s
tenuous hold over its western periphery in
Xinjiang. The separatist Islamic movement in
Xinjiang draws sustenance from the Taliban
and associated outfits. The headquarters of
the Xinjiang separatist movement is reported
to be functioning in the Taliban held areas
of FATA in Northern Pakistan.
Concluding
Observations
Pakistan’s
Talibanization is not only an existential
threat to Pakistan existence but an added
threat to global and regional security and
stability. This threat gets amplified in
magnitude with the prospects of a Taliban
take-over of Pakistanis nuclear weapons and
missiles arsenal.
China’s geographically
contiguity with Pakistan centering on
China’s own restive peripheries coupled with
China’s considerable strategic stakes and
strategic investments in Pakistan
makes Pakistan’s strategic utility to China
far outweighing Pakistan’s strategic utility
to the United States.
Pakistan’s
Talibanization and the strategic
uncertainties that could be generated in its
wake would seriously endanger China’s global
and regional standing.
China has taken nearly
half a century to forge a strategic asset
like Pakistan to serve its strategic ends.
It cannot afford to take another half a
century to build an alternative to
Pakistan.
China seemingly will be
left with no option but to use its
significant leverages over the Pakistan Army
to impel it to effectively prevent a Taliban
take-over of Pakistan: Such an option offers
multiple advantages to China in that
Pakistan continues as a strategic asset for
China; the global community perceives China
as a “respectable stake holder” in global
affairs and lastly the Taliban’s disruptive
Islamic potential to destabilize China's
restive western periphery is neutralized.
(The
author is an International Relations and
Strategic Affairs analyst. He is the
Consultant, Strategic Affairs with South
Asia Analysis Group. Email:drsubhashkapila.007@gmail.com)