Body-Counts Without Bodies - International
Terrorism Monitor---Paper No. 536
By B. Raman
"The Obama
Administration's policy of showering
Pakistan with money and arms and ammunition
even in the absence of proof of sincerity
and conviction and even in the absence of
progress on the ground is once again
creating a worrisome impression in the
Pakistani leaders that to continue to
benefit from US support and largesse all
they have to do is to create an illusion of
motion without actual movement. That is what
they are doing. That is what Pervez
Musharraf did when he was the President. The
two Waziristans came under the effective
control of Al Qaeda, the Taliban and their
associates and the Neo Taliban of
Afghanistan, operating from sanctuaries in
Balochistan, staged its spectacular
come-back in Afghanistan when he was the
President and was the beneficiary of
billions of dollars given by the Bush
Administration. What promises he made to the
Bush Administration to reform and modernise
the madrasas and prevent their misuse for
jihad! How much money he took from the US
for madrasa reforms! What happened to those
reforms? That is exactly what Zardari,
Gilani and Kayani are doing now. Creating an
illusion of motion without actual movement,
while extracting billions of dollars from
the US. The Pakistani leadership---political
and military--- has developed into a fine
art the extraction of money from the US by
exploiting the presence of Al Qaeda and the
Taliban in their territory. If the Taliban
ultimately succeeds in further strengthening
and expanding its control in Pakistan, the
US will have to share a major portion of the
responsibility for failing to make Pakistan
act effectively instead of merely seeming to
do so. "
2. So I wrote in
my article of May 22, 2009, titled "Pak
Army's Taliban Hunt: Seeming Motion Without
Movement" available at http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers33/paper3209.html.
3. Responsible
people in Pakistan have started doubting the
claims of the Pakistan Army about the
progress being made by it in its operations
against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
Even its claims of having killed over 1500
members of the Pakistani Taliban in the Swat
Valley of the North-West Frontier Province
are now being doubted because the Pakistan
Army has not produced any evidence in
support of its claims. Had the Army really
killed so many members of the Taliban, there
should have been mass graves in that area.
The Army has not been able to produce the
dead bodies of those killed---nor has it
been able to indicate where the hundreds of
dead bodies of the killed Taliban were
buried. Not one of the important leaders
has been killed or captured.
4. For the first
time, a responsible member of Pakistan's
strategic analysts community----- Zafar
Hilaly, a retired officer of the Pakistan
Foreign Service--- has reflected in an
article published by the "News" of June 24,
2009, the nagging skepticism about the
reliability of the claims of the Army. A
copy of his article is annexed.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New
Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute
For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)
ANNEXURE
THE DEAD DO TELL
TALES
Wednesday, June
24, 2009
Zafar Hilaly
The army is fast
acquiring a credibility problem with its
claims of dead, injured and captured
Taliban. At first there were mere
mutterings, sotto voce suspicions, that not
all is as claimed. These doubts are
increasing; the chorus of suspicion is more
voluble and before they acquire the
dimensions of a scream the Army had better
attend to it.
The pleasant and
able and composed DG, ISPR in fact alluded
to these suspicions on June 22 when he said
that the army had not wanted to show
pictures of the dead lest the public become
upset but, presumably, in response to public
demand, he showed 54 pictures of dead
Taliban. All of whom appeared very much as
one would expect those killed in battle. I
doubt if anyone was upset by those images.
Actually, for Pakistanis fed on a rich diet
of Taliban videos showing gory executions of
soldiers, with the sound on, they were
rather tame. In fact most watching probably
relished seeing their tormentors dead.
Noticeably, there
were no photos of injured Taliban and only a
desultory few of those claimed to have been
captured have ever been shown on TV. In
contrast the Taliban paraded their victims,
allowed interviews and generally made a
great show about their capture and their own
prowess. Of course, it was done with the aim
of terrorising the populace just as for the
army to show their captives in all poses
would hopefully also terrorise the enemy.
Some Taliban
practices may be worth adopting because
photos of a mere 54 dead while claiming that
the actual number is 2000 do not wash.
Especially as not a single one of the first
tier leaders has been killed, wounded or
captured and rumours are circulating that
the Taliban leadership have been evacuated
away from the danger zone, along with Al
Qaeda leaders to Yemen, Somalia and
Afghanistan and would return in due course.
Pakistanis are a
suspicious lot when it comes to evaluating
official claims, perhaps because they tend
to deceive even when it is easier to tell
the truth; or because they have learnt from
experience that "official speak" is
invariably wrong or comes with a spin; or
because the claims are so fatuous as to defy
credulity. For example, after every air
strike the number of dead militants ranges
from six to 14 militants, seldom more. All
of them are supposed to be insurgents,
rarely civilians, presumably because, unlike
the Americans, we have very discriminating
"Taliban seeking" missiles. Considering the
difficult terrain and the risk to be
incurred by the usually "reliable" sources
reaching the site of the bombing it is
remarkable how quickly the numbers of dead
and injured are counted, processed and
reported in the press the next day. Whoever
does such an efficient job should be asked
to lead our flaying attempts to cope with
the IDPs problem.
It was also
revealing that the BBC correspondent who was
taken on a tour of the battle zone, he
termed it "bandit country," said that while
he was shown a half dozen or so of "captured
Taliban" he saw none of the 2000 dead nor
any graves or other signs of death. Instead
BBC viewers last night got to see what the
Taliban had allowed him to film which was
the hanging corpse of a beheaded soldier and
another who had been killed, with boastful
Taliban standing nearby. Clearly there is
something wrong with the optics of this war
as far as Pakistan is concerned.
Of much greater
concern was a news report carried in Dawn of
23 June entitled "Efforts on for patch- up
between Darra Taliban, Adezai lashkar,"
which states that "Some "invisible" forces(
normally a euphemism for we know who) are
out to narrow the differences and broker an
understanding between the Darra Adam Khel-based
Taliban and leaders of the Qaumi Lashkar of
Adezai on the outskirts of the provincial
capital – the Taliban conditions included
that their men would freely move in parts of
Peshawar and would take action against those
found involved in 'un-Islamic' activities
and the Lashkar would not object to their
actions. Secondly, the Taliban want the
lashkar not to create hurdles while they
recruit new members. Another condition of
the Taliban is that the lashkar will not
support security forces in case of any clash
between the Taliban and law enforcing
agencies."
Apparently two
rounds of negotiations have already been
held and members of the "Tableeghii Jamaat
were active to broker an understanding
between the two sides". When the local
police chief was asked about these
negotiations he denied all knowledge of
them. Both are probably telling the truth.
The left hand in Pakistan often does not
know what the right hand is doing. Or the
left side of the mouth, in the case of the
Interior Minister, who claimed that
Fazlullah had been "trapped," does not have
a clue what the right side, which denied he
had made any such statement, is saying.
Such reports, if
true, damage the sincerity of the army's
efforts and rob its actions and claims of
credibility. It is difficult to believe that
even while the army is engaged in fighting
and dying in Swat another arm of government
is negotiating deals with the same blood
thirsty foe of murderers, kidnappers and
drug peddlars. The report further negates
the claim of the Tableeghi Jamaat that it is
a purely religious organisation rather than
one with a political agenda, as many have
long suspected. (I recall being summoned to
the Yemeni Foreign Office in 1988 and being
asked why the Tableeqi Jamaat chose Yemen to
spread the word of Islam. In the words of
the Yemeni official: "Excellency, this is
our religion, we gave it to you, please
don't try and teach us the proper Islam. Ask
them to go somewhere else. Or do they have
some other agenda.")
Mr Zardari has
written a column in the Washington Post
emphasising that democracy and democracy
alone is the panacea for Pakistan's
problems. Unfortunately many of his
countrymen are not so certain. Pakistanis
are as sceptical about democracy as they are
about dictatorship. Both have failed to
deliver. Both speak with forked tongues.
Similarly, Mr Zardari has claimed that he
will fight terrorism to the bitter end.
"Fight" should be the operative word and not
"negotiate" deals of the sort being hustled
in Peshawar.
The writer is a former ambassador. Email:
charles123it@hotmail.com