Paper no.
3949
|
26-July-2010
|
HOW LONG WILL US COVER UP
PAKISTAN?
By B.Raman
According to Wikipedia, a 22-year-old US
Army intelligence analyst, Bradley Manning,
was arrested by the United States Army
Criminal Investigation Command in May 2010.
Manning was detained without charge in a
military jail at Camp Arifjan in Kuwait.
2. To quote the Wikipedia: "In early July,
he was faced with two charges of misconduct:
"transferring classified data onto his
personal computer and adding unauthorised
software to a classified computer system"
and "communicating, transmitting and
delivering national defence information to
an unauthorised source". The maximum jail
sentence is 52 years. Lieutenant Colonel
Eric Bloom has said that "as part of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice, the next
step in proceedings would be an Article 32
Hearing, which is similar to a grand jury.
An investigating officer will be appointed,
and that officer looks into all facts of the
matter, does an investigation, and upon
conclusion, the findings will be presented
to a convening court martial authority. The
division commander will consider based on
what is in that, what the next steps are.
Either there is enough evidence or not
enough evidence to proceed to a
court-martial ... A date has not yet been
set. We haven't even identified the
investigating officer. We're still in the
early stages of this case".
3. It added: "Manning allegedly told
journalist and former hacker Adrian Lamo via
instant messenging that he had leaked the
"Collateral Murder" video (of the July 12,
2007 Baghdad airstrike), in addition to a
video of the Granai airstrike and around
260,000 diplomatic cables, to the
whistleblower website Wikileaks. Lamo handed
the instant messenger chat logs to U.S.
investigators, who began searching for
evidence to determine whether Manning's
apparent statements to Lamo were true. The
"Collateral Murder" video showed an attack
by a U.S. helicopter crew on a group of men
presumed to be insurgents. Two children were
wounded, and several men were killed,
including the father of the children and two
men who were later identified as Reuters
employees. Manning reportedly said that the
diplomatic documents expose "almost criminal
political back dealings" and that they
explain "how the first world exploits the
third, in detail". He said that he hoped the
release of the videos and documents would
lead to "worldwide discussion, debates, and
reforms". Manning reportedly wrote,
"everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a
diplomatic scandal that will be revealed."
However, Wikileaks said "allegations that
we have been sent 260,000 classified US
embassy cables are, as far as we can tell,
incorrect".
4.On June 17, 2010, Daniel Ellsberg, a
military analyst working for the Rand
Corporation during the Vietnam war, who had
similarly leaked on grounds of conscience a
large number of Pentagon papers about the
Vietnam war, was interviewed by Amy Goodman
and Juan Gonzales on the Democracy Now! TV
and Radio show regarding the parallels
between his actions and those of Bradley
Manning.Ellsberg said that he feared for
Manning and another person by name Julian
Assange, as he feared for himself after the
initial publication of the Pentagon Papers.
He called them "two new heroes of mine".
5. Though Wikileaks, the whistleblowers' web
site, may not admit it, there are strong
grounds for suspecting that Bradley Manning
must have been the source of the nearly
90,000 classified documents, mainly relating
to the war in Afghanistan, which were
uploaded by Wikileaks on its web site on
July 25. It had allegedly made many of them
available in advance to the "New York
Times", the "Guardian" of the UK and "Der
Spiegal" of Germany.
6.Senator John Kerry, the Chairman of of the
US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who
is close to President Barack Obama, has been
quoted by the British Broadcasting
Corporation as saying that the leak came
at a "critical stage" for US policy in the
region. He added: "However illegally these
documents came to light, they raise serious
questions about the reality of America's
policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan."
7.How long will the US cover up the misdeeds
of Pakistan against India in order to
protect American lives and interests? How
long will India keep silent on the US
cover-up of Pakistani misdeeds in the
long-term interests of the developing
strategic relations between India and the
US? For an Indian, these are the two
questions which assume even greater
importance than in the past as a result of
the leakage. The leaked documents confirm
three facts which were already
known---firstly, the role of Pakistan in
training and arming the Taliban; secondly,
the role of Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) and the Taliban in
organising a car bomb explosion through a
suicide bomber outside the Indian Embassy in
Kabul on July 7,2008, and thirdly, the
attempts of the ISI to use the Taliban to
have the Hamid Karzai Government in
Afghanistan destabilised. Fifty-eight
persons, including India's Defence attache
Brigadier R D Mehta and Counsellor
Venkateswara Rao, were killed when the
suicide bomber targeted the Embassy during
the morning rush hour.
8.The leaked documents also show that the
Taliban has shoulder-fired, heat-seeking
missiles which it had been using against
NATO planes and helicopters. During the
1980s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
had trained the Afghan Mujahideen in the use
of Stinger missiles against Soviet aircraft.
It had issued a large stock of these
missiles to the ISI for being given to the
Afghan Mujahideen. The ISI issued some to
the Mujahideen, gave some to Iran and one to
North Korea for re-engineering purposes and
kept some for use by the Pakistan Army
against India. After the withdrawal of the
Soviet troops from Afghanistan, the CIA
asked the ISI to buy back the unused Stinger
missiles from the Afghan Mujahideen and
return them to the CIA. The ISI evaded doing
so. On coming to office in January 1993,
President Bill Clinton forced Mr.Nawaz
Sharif, the then Pakistani Prime Minister,
to sack Lt.Gen.Javed Nasir, the then
Director-General of the ISI, and some other
senior officers who had avoided returning
the unused Stinger missiles. Till Mr.Nawaz
sacked them. Mr.Clinton had placed Pakistan
on a so-called list of suspected
State-sponsors of terrorism. In 1994, when
the Taliban was formed by the ISI, some of
the unused Stinger missiles were given to
it. The leaked documents only mention in
passing that the Taliban has shoulder-fired
missiles without mentioning all these
details as to how the Stinger missiles
reached the Taliban.
9. This is one of many such instances of the
ISI training and arming the Taliban, the
Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET) and other terrorist
organisations for using them to advance its
strategic agenda in Afghanistan and India.
It has been brazenly doing this because of
its confidence that the US would not take
any punitive action against it and that the
Indian leadership and bureaucracy would not
have the courage to act against it----either
on the diplomatic or military front or
through appropriate covert actions. The ISI
did have some fears when Indira Gandhi,
Rajiv Gandhi and Narasimha Rao were Prime
Ministers, but thereafter it lost all fears
because of a succession of soft Prime
Ministers we have had.
10. Will the revelations about Pakistan and
the ISI in the documents leaked to Wikileaks
lead at long last to Pakistan and its ISI
being subjected to punitive action. I have
serious doubts. After some strong
statements, the US will hush up the matter
once again and the Govt. of India will avoid
pressing the US to act against Pakistan. It
is a great national shame.
( The writer is Additional
Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt.
of India, New Delhi, and, presently,
Director, Institute For Topical Studies,
Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre
For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com
)
|
|
Back
to the top
Home
| Papers | Notes
| Forum | Search
| Feedback | Links
Copyright ©
South Asia Analysis Group
All rights
reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for
use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the
author's name are acknowledged. Copies may not be
duplicated for commercial purposes.
|
|